The judge also said an entire budget measure that served as a
catch-all for a wish list of conservative policy items was
unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional? LMAO
States cannot make rules that cities and school districts
have to abide by now? It’s unconstitutional if they do?
Funny, I don’t recall ever seeing a judge state that, “a
catch-all for a wish list of Leftist policy items was
unconstitutional.
She tipped her hand.
She’s evidently a Leftist and can’t stomach the idea Republican
got their measures through.
She striking down portions of a state bill, she most certainly
has over-ruled the Legislature, and that is Legislating
from the bench. She determines what the final
legislation will look like. She determined the bill’s
final draft.
That is legislating from the bench.
States cannot make rules that cities and school districts
have to abide by now? It’s unconstitutional if they do?
THE FOLLOWING IS THE REASON THE JUDGE SAYS THE MEASURES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL:
Section 13
Text of Section 13:
Subject and Title of Bills
“ Every act shall embrace but one subject and matters properly connected therewith, which subject shall be expressed in the title; but if any subject shall be embraced in an act which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be embraced in the title.[1][2] ”