Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastexsteve

Won’t comply. It’s unconstitutional on its face as written. Marbury v Madison, therefore null and void.


5 posted on 10/11/2021 5:10:56 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

The dems need this type of bill to pass to take over the country.


12 posted on 10/11/2021 5:16:43 PM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

The dems need this type of bill to pass to take over the country.


13 posted on 10/11/2021 5:16:43 PM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

“Won’t comply. It’s unconstitutional on its face as written.”

That IS NOT for you (or me, or anyone else here) to decide. It is up to judges to decide, and if they’re appointed by Democrats, guess what - you can bet that IT IS CONSTITUTIONAL.

...like it or not.


43 posted on 10/11/2021 6:21:05 PM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson