Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impala64ssa

She makes a key statement at the end that demonstrates how CLUELESS she is about our legal system.

“because if you’re gonna make an argument that you acted in self-defense, there needs to be some proof that there was an imminent threat.”

No, sweetie, the State has to prove you acted absent the need for deadly force.

You simply do not have to prove your innocence in a real US court room.


15 posted on 11/09/2021 2:15:52 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: ad ferre non, velit esse sine defensione)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag

“You simply do not have to prove your innocence in a real US court room.”

Perhaps, back in the day.


22 posted on 11/09/2021 2:25:57 PM PST by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson