In a statement provided on behalf of Bannon to the Washington Post, he said, “In the opposition filed today, Mr. Bannon asked the judge to follow the normal process and allow unfettered access to and use of t he documents. Members of the public should make their own independent judgement as to whether the U.S. Department of Justice is committed to a just result based upon all the facts.”
—
How will the 1/6 Commission lie if all documents are made public?
Curious as to how the DOJ can restrict the information.
It isn’t a case on classified information/events. If it were it’d be in FISC.
He’s allowed Disclosure. Once it’s his, it’s his. And if they go the classified information route, then his lawyer has get a security clearance.
It is a show trial, but the evidence is secret.
Where is a Star Chamber when you need one?
Because Clapper and Brennan had the shadow See Eye Hay spying on the office of the President.
“Democracy dies in darkness.”
Huh. So there’s one actually useful purpose for a toll road. Go figure.
Right to face your accuser.
There is an interesting question whether due process and the Brady Rules etc apply to Congressional hearings/commissions. Maybe they should.
Ha, ha.
I’d really like to see that.
Wonder if there is any instant karma for the dimocraps in that?
It this to be a public trial or a star chamber? Silly me to ask.
Under Brady v. Maryland, Bannon is entitled to all the documents, call logs, texts, emails, etc. associated with the January 6 committee, including those same documents between the committee and the DOJ; and also the internal DOJ documents that are not directly work product.
Must be thousands of documents.
Can’t wait to see Bannons list of witnesses he wants to subpoena. Bet there are at least 50, including Merrit Garland; he must have been involved in the decision making process to get Bannon indicted.