Blackmail & the Jesuits, Adam Weishaupt (Illluminati & Masons), Freud, Kinsey -- Bergoglio?

"I am not speaking of you all; I know whom I have chosen; it is that the Scripture may be fulfilled, `He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.` " - John 13:18

Judas Iscariot at the Left as the Apostles Argue about Who Will Betray Jesus

Does Pope Francis have the same relationship with the broad sweep of Papal Electors, as he has with those whose secrets he has and whom he keeps closest to him?

It is widely reported that Francis keeps closest to himself, Catholic officials who have committed serious ethical lapses, often against the sixth and ninth commandments, men whose functional loyalty he can command by reason of duress, not indiscreetly to call it "blackmail".

It's now a kind of return full circle of the once pristine, historical Jesuit Chapter of Faults, for Pope Francis to keep a stable of compliant subordinates on whom he can keep the most intimate and complete dossiers, through the long history of the Masonic blackmail-exploitation of Adam Weishaupt, the ethically questionable psychiatric activity of Sigmund Freud, and socially devastating acts of Alfred Kinsey, now seeming to include Catholic Church destroyer, Pope Francis, who was early on (when Ratzinger was being elected Pope), rejected as ethnically unsuitable by Papal kingmaker, the late Carlo Maria Cardinal Martini S.J. († 2012) after confidential internal Jesuit inquiries in Argentina.

The Chapter of Faults was a system used by the Jesuit, Catholic religious order in its heyday, for Jesuits to prepare for the Sacrament of Confession, by rehearsing their confessions to their immediate superiors, who sent a copy to the next level of superiors. But the system was extremely confidential, with no prominent, known historical breaches.

* In the 18th century, an illuminatist named Adam Weishaupt exploited the wide system of relatively harmless Masonic Lodges, with an "improved" version of the Jesuit system, in which Weishaupt would use Illuminati initiates' confidential histories as blackmail against them, to control them.

* Sigmund Freud was known to use his own wealthy patients' confidential histories as leverage to ensure big donations to his psychotherapy association, controlled by himself.

* Alfred Kinsey was accustomed to showing his extremely rare, hard child pornography to Rockefeller foundation grant managers, and take their "personal histories", after which he had no trouble ensuring continual grant increases, until the quirks in his statistics were noted by experts and a new generation of Rockefeller grant managers were led by someone who had never submitted to a personal sexual history interview, and was thereby immune to blackmail. So Kinsey was cut off, but by then had government grants, as well as confidential ties with Hugh Heffner of Playboy.

But how can Francis ensure the working of his will on the next papal conclave? Was consideration for elevation to the College of Cardinals, the body of Papal electors, conditional on Francis "having something" on each of them, as much as the Cardinals elect ostensibly agreeing with Francis' outlook?

A couple of considerations about this whether Francis' personal files can work his will beyond the grave:

No one would risk a [Michael] Kinsley Gaffe in the press, (the opposite, in terms of confidentiality and candor, of an Alfred Kinsey "interview"), to talk plainly in public about J. Edgar Hoover's trove of intimate secrets on all significant public figures, after his 1972 death, but it was widely presumed that he would not will the legacy of his secret files to any successor. Instead, rumor has it Hoover directed that his critical files be completely destroyed as soon as he would die.

(Alfred Kinsey had no training as a medical doctor, psychiatrist or social scientist, he was a moth scientist, but he had the interest in human sexuality, as an extreme sexual deviant.)

It has been reported that there is a kind of security tripwire set to auto-destruct the archives of the Kinsey Institute in case of security breach - "where the mines are buried".

It seems reasonable that a post-Bergoglio Vatican will keep his true history under wraps. But just maybe, die list der vernunft, "the cunning of reason" according to the philosopher Hegel, by which the best laid plans of mice and men often backfire, will be in operation. Blowback, unintended consequences especially against Francis' destruction of the Traditional Latin Mass and devout Religious Orders, will be on all the Papal Electors' minds, about rubber stamping Francis' chosen successor. It may completely disrupt the decades long political maneuvering.

Francis's Doomsday Machine may be set to implode upon itself, taking out a large swath of the Progressives with it.

Seems to me-

One thing that points to the likely-not-Christian status of this rabble, if this business of blackmail is true, is that they say they can conceal nothing from God, their supposed Master and Lord, the one to whom they ascribe the attribute of Omniscience; and yet they continue in lies, coverups, intrigue, and other games of covetousness and false witness.

They fear men rather than God.

Their organization is therefore nothing more than a moose lodge or enthusiast’s club. And I say “Their” club, because it is just that; man-made and self-serving.

Matthew 7:15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.

Matthew 7:21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

I fear that the conclusion is mostly wishful thinking in that it seems to assume that the Vatican is morally and doctrinally sound except for Pope Francis and his immediate circle of supporters. In truth though the College of Cardinals and the Curia are deeply compromised by moral derelictions and apostacy in various forms.

I suggest that a more accurate view is that Pope Francis, in the manner of his boyhood hero Peron, won his office and advances his goals by artful political scheming, if with some notions of being a reformer. At his best Pope Francis has attempted to clean up the Vatican's corrupt finances but is out of his depth in that task and in general as Pope.

Notably, the false charges and wrongful imprisonment of Australia's Cardinal Pell deprived Pope Francis and the Church of an honest and faithful reformer and conservative who was close to and trusted by Pope Francis. Cardinal Pell's vindication and return to the Vatican offers some hope that he will act as a check on Pope Francis's more ill chosen ideas. One can imagine and hope that if better advised, Pope Francis will become a better Pope -- or at least a less damaging one.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.