And they are _utterly_ convinced that they are right, and have _zero_ capacity to think critically about _any_ part of their argument.
"Climatologists say" is not science, it's the bandwagon fallacy.
Computer models aren't science either, until they start correctly predicting observations.
I have two degrees in a hard science and one in an applied science. A close relative has a degree in history and one in school administration. Guess which one of us is utterly convinced that "climate change" [sic] is a dire emergency, because "that's what the science says".
[[ Computer models aren’t science either, until they start correctly predicting observations]]
Theynactually,changed the numbers from satellite reag because the readings showed there was no temperature increase for almost,20 years. True story.
They were dismayed that the numbers didn’t show warmign for 20 years, so they claimed that one of the satellites was ‘out of,positions or ‘not positioned correctly or some such nonsense, so they “recalculated” and put in numbers that they thought “should have been observed if ther satellite was positioned correctly”, and lo,and behold, alakazam, bingo bingo bongo, there’s your 20,year warming increase