Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Unveils Next-Generation DDG(X) Warship Concept with Hypersonic Missiles, Lasers
USNI ^ | 1/12/22 | Sam LaGrone

Posted on 01/12/2022 6:00:53 PM PST by MAGA2017

ARLINGTON, Va. – The Navy wants its next warship to fire hypersonic missiles and lasers that would be ten times more powerful than the service’s existing laser weapons, according to the most detailed outlook to date of the DDG(X) next generation warship issued by the service.

The warship, the largest the Navy’s attempted in more than 20 years, is designed to provide the service with the power to drive a new generation of directed energy weapons and high-power sensors that will follow the Navy’s current fleet of Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers. The warship is estimated to start construction in 2028, the Navy told USNI News last year.

“Capabilities that we’re going to need for the 21st century to continue combating the threat are increased missile capability sensor growth, directed energy weapons, which actually require a lot of power, increased survivability and increased power availability,” deputy program manager Katherine Connelly said at a Wednesday briefing at the Surface Navy Association symposium.

The Navy is developing the DDG(X) using the combat system developed from the Flight III Arleigh Burkes that incorporated the new SPY-6 air search radar and the Baseline 10 Aegis combat system.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.usni.org ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ddgx; lasers; navy; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
But how "diverse" will the crew be? Democrats want to know.
1 posted on 01/12/2022 6:00:53 PM PST by MAGA2017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

2028

6 years from now

We only have 9 years left before its all over

Not sure why we’re planning for anything that far out


2 posted on 01/12/2022 6:02:56 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Most importantly, will there be designated safe spaces? The ship itself looks pretty nice for a rendering.


3 posted on 01/12/2022 6:04:03 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Here’s to hoping the first generation of hypersonic naval weapons have a better track record than our early WWII Mark 14 torpedoes.


4 posted on 01/12/2022 6:04:54 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Can it avoid freighters?


5 posted on 01/12/2022 6:04:55 PM PST by alternatives? (The only reason to have an army is to defend your borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

The LGBTQ+IA crew will wreck it into something first day out.


6 posted on 01/12/2022 6:08:27 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

They should want their future ships to have ultra hypersonic missiles and lasers 100x more powerful. Amateurs.


7 posted on 01/12/2022 6:08:31 PM PST by Sarcazmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Sharks with friggin lasers?


8 posted on 01/12/2022 6:09:07 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (How many were shot dead at the insurrection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

Bath Iron Works will be ready!


9 posted on 01/12/2022 6:09:13 PM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

I suppose they won’t be looking like such a leap like the Zumwalts. But a laser-based defense shield seems so advanced. Especially without a nuclear power source.


10 posted on 01/12/2022 6:10:16 PM PST by Houserino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017
The Navy is also calling for a ship that can travel 50 percent farther and spend 120 times longer time on station.

The DD(X) will be one heck of a ship!

11 posted on 01/12/2022 6:10:34 PM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

I hope these new destroyers are better designed and built than the LCS has been.


12 posted on 01/12/2022 6:12:23 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Suppo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

I hope it’s not the same engineers and naval architects that designed the Gerald Ford. The buzzers and bells need to work.


13 posted on 01/12/2022 6:12:46 PM PST by llevrok (Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017
Maybe we should hire some sailors from Eastern Europe to man it. Our "boyz" are too busy getting their gender change operations.

14 posted on 01/12/2022 6:13:48 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

15 posted on 01/12/2022 6:14:22 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Suppo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

> The Navy wants its next warship to fire hypersonic missiles ... <

Each shell for the USS Zumwalt‘s cannon reportedly costs $800,000, making them too expensive to fire for practice. I wonder how much each of those hypersonic missiles will cost.


16 posted on 01/12/2022 6:15:32 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houserino

Jet turbines can crank out a lot of power. The main benefit of nuclear power is not providing more electricity at peak need, it provides power for years without refueling. The Ford class carriers could probably sail 30 years without refueling - that’s millions of miles of going anywhere you want.

They would however need refueling for the planes - unless we have secret black nuclear-powered military aircraft that we haven’t told anyone about.


17 posted on 01/12/2022 6:18:33 PM PST by WMarshal ("Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
I wonder how much each of those hypersonic missiles will cost.

"If you have to ask, you can't afford it."

18 posted on 01/12/2022 6:26:06 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The experts are liars. The conspiracy theorists are the people who have figured out the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MAGA2017

I’m assuming that instead of that dreary camouflage paint scheme they will be painted pretty & pink and have flower gardens on the decks...


19 posted on 01/12/2022 6:42:10 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houserino

You don’t need a nuclear power source. You store the energy in a large battery and as the battery is drained the windmills on the back will replenish them.


20 posted on 01/12/2022 6:46:56 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson