Humiliating? Maybe he should have thought thru having sex with underage kids.
He is one of many who my gut tells me did what they did with underage girls in the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein.
This one man is one of 100 or more who did the same thing and may never face a civil lawsuit or anything else for doing it.
“Maybe he should have thought thru having sex with underage kids.”
Per the article, the lady suing him is not accusing him of that.
As details are coming out, this woman is alleged to have, as an adult, recruited young girls for Epstein. This is a civil sex trafficking claim and Andrew was the John not the trafficker. Do you seriously think he was the only one, or is he just the richest one still alive? There were other men on the plane with her at any given time reportedly even Billy Bob Clinton.
Andrew was a fool who was controlled by his little head. I assume he felt immune. He has two choices as I read it. Let the trial proceed and fight back. If he wins, he loses because his sordid sex life will be public record and embarrass the royals. If he loses, he loses and she will be rich. If he settles he loses because everyone will assume guilt and she is rich. Everyone already assumes his quilt, because everyone thinks the woman was a little girl and is automatically a victim. This is a civil hearing not criminal. Rules of evidence are much different and they can and will tell every little detail of the “victims” life, attacking her credibility.
I know of a case where a service member was found guilty of a misdemeanor sexual charge, but won the civil suit when the “victims” past was exposed. You cannot do that in a criminal case, but you can attack the “victim” in a civil case. If the allegations are true that she helped recruit young girls for Epstein and I were one of those girls. I would until Randy Andy settles and then hire a top legal team and sue her for millions. Turnaround is fair play.