Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waters: ‘Disrespectful, Dishonorable’ to Claim Black Female SCOTUS Pick Is Affirmative Action
Breitbart ^ | Jan 2022 | PAM KEY30

Posted on 01/30/2022 6:12:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) said Sunday on MSNBC’s “Alex Witt Reports” that Republicans claiming President Joe Biden’s promise to choose a black woman for the Supreme Court is an example of affirmative action is both disrespectful and dishonorable.

Waters said, “For a black woman to become a Supreme Court justice would be one of the most historic and important things this country can do and experience. It is just so exciting to think about it. I guess what is it? Over 260 years, we’ve never even had a black woman nominated. And there are only two black males on the Supreme Court. To have a black woman, there would be a game-changer.”

During The Gallo Radio Show, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) said, “The irony is the Supreme Court is at the very same time hearing cases about this sort of affirmative racial discrimination, and while adding someone who is the beneficiary of this sort of quota, the majority of the court may be saying at large, it’s unconstitutional. We’ll see how that irony works out.”

Waters said, “It’s so disrespectful. The way he’s coming out is outdated. Even the most conservative member of the Supreme Court and Republicans know that it is beyond time to diversify the Supreme Court of America. And the absence of a woman, a black woman, means that it is not diversified. You don’t have at the table the voices of everyone in this country that should be represented.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; larsandtherealjudge; madmax; maxandtherealjudge; maxinetheracist; maxinewaters; rogerwicker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Must be over the target.
1 posted on 01/30/2022 6:12:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That must be why Joe filibustered against on in the last century.


2 posted on 01/30/2022 6:16:24 PM PST by bravo whiskey (Annie Savoy : The world is made for people who aren't cursed with self awareness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Of course it would be AA. There is no other explanation. If she is the best for the job, fine. If she gets the job for being black it’s AA, and therefore disgraceful.

But what would Biden be but disgraceful?


3 posted on 01/30/2022 6:16:48 PM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

Concede nothing. All of the names mentioned so far are hacks in black. None are even MINIMALLY qualified.


4 posted on 01/30/2022 6:18:25 PM PST by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When the main criteria is the color of one’s skin rather than the content of one’s character, Dr. Martin Luther King could figure out what was going on. Doesn’t look like his dream will ever come true.


5 posted on 01/30/2022 6:18:58 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Waters: ‘Disrespectful, Dishonorable’ to Claim Black Female SCOTUS Pick Is Affirmative Action”

We don’t have to claim it. Joe Biden claimed it when he announced the gender and color of the person he would pick BEFORE he announced the name.

Waters can lay it all at the paws of Joe Biden.


6 posted on 01/30/2022 6:21:18 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
If she is the best for the job, fine.

The way "they" work is that it is points that make one best for the job. They don't say 'best qualified', just 'best'.

The only question is whether they are going to settle for a two pointer, or whether they are going to go for a three pointer.

7 posted on 01/30/2022 6:21:33 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Affirmative action hires don’t get much respect for a reason.


8 posted on 01/30/2022 6:21:39 PM PST by seowulf (Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty, and dies with chaos...Will Durant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maxine Waters has shot her wad! She doesn’t have any credibility left anymore. She has been so emotional and out of touch, that now when she wants people to hear, it will be deflected. Sorry Maxine, I do like your wig.


9 posted on 01/30/2022 6:23:55 PM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So what MadMax is saying is that it's Affirmative Action to install a mediocre phony stooge-judge who's a Lefty rubberstamp because the puppet has the correct black skin color...

Lars And The Real Judge


10 posted on 01/30/2022 6:28:06 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She speaks as one who has no knowledge of her words.


11 posted on 01/30/2022 6:30:44 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Contempt is the essential tool of the tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And there are only two black males on the Supreme Court.

And one of them the Democrats rejected.

12 posted on 01/30/2022 6:32:52 PM PST by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It may not actually be.

But its clearly racist. And sexist.

And it means that skin color and sex organs are the first two most important qualities for this scotus selection.


13 posted on 01/30/2022 6:32:55 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And there are only two black males on the Supreme Court.

Huh?

14 posted on 01/30/2022 6:34:21 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
> "You don’t have at the table the voices of everyone in this country that should be represented.”

What an utterly idiotic thing to say. The Congress is the "representative of everyone in the country". The only thing the Supreme Court "represents" is the Constitution of the United States -- the ultimate law of the land -- not the people governed by that law.

A fundamental purpose of the Supreme Court is to determine the Constitutionality of laws passed by Congress, by being the highest court of appeal.

Waters is decades past her "Best If Used By" expiration date.

15 posted on 01/30/2022 6:37:38 PM PST by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bass Mouth needs to put a sock in it.

She really needs to sit down and be quiet.


16 posted on 01/30/2022 6:38:25 PM PST by sauropod (Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown

I think she meant ever. Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas.


17 posted on 01/30/2022 6:39:16 PM PST by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: facedown
And there are only two black males on the Supreme Court.


18 posted on 01/30/2022 6:40:03 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maybe Kagan identifies as a black man?


19 posted on 01/30/2022 6:43:47 PM PST by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

To pick a black female simply because Biden wants a black female is the very definition of affirmative action.


20 posted on 01/30/2022 6:46:46 PM PST by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson