An article lacking any substance whatsoever. The writers should be flogged. Repeatedly.
What moral values “changed”? To what degree did they not change, but the differences between the candidates were not great enough to matter, so other values where significant differences that did exist rose in importance?
Oh, no reporting at all of the details of what values were studied, what alternative hypotheses were considered, tested?
Worthless article. A waste of digital ink.
I used to be one of those people polled by multiple organizations and Im pretty sure I see the game being played here.
Those “polls” are all rigged and this survey is really no different. There are no correct answers offered then they come to a conclusion that wasnt really part of the question. For example, “Should social security continue A. as presently funded or B. modifications need to be made funding or C. dont know?” The answer is none of the above, what the pollsters report is “100% of those surveyed support continuing social security”.
“Center for the Study of Political Psychology at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities”
Really look at that name. A university operating in a communist hell hole using a “science” packed with charlatans and fraudsters publishing results which are not capable of being reproduced that are misused to coerce the populace. This is similar to a person in a manure pond on an island of **** claiming they have successfully sorted out the more valuable b******t (just as their grants have paid them to).
Its a game of “Have you stopped beating your wife yet?” Ill bet the game is rigged something similar to this...
They asked questions about beliefs intended to sort people down the aisle then asked what these people felt about Trump. As one example, Im guessing they did something along the lines of predetermining that “All conservatives support marriage and say marriage is for life.” Based on this rule, since Trump has been married multiple times he does not represent conservative moral beliefs. “Conservatives all believe that there should be no safety nets and each person is responsible for his own outcomes.” Trump has filed bankruptcy therefor Trump has violated this no help moral value. They compared their profile of conservative personal beliefs to the actions of Trump and determined that the two didnt match to create what appears to be a dichotomy of thought.
By rigging a set of predetermined rules of what conservatives must believe, while ignoring why people voted for Trump, and then comparing those moral rules to Trumps past actions, they are able to “truthfully” report a result they were attempting to achieve.