Trying to negate guilt of another by equating it to crimes here is irrelevant. We have our own problem to deal with IN ADDITION, but as I noted, even the grotesquely corrupted federal “justice” system currently imprisoning harmless citizens without Constitutionally mandated bail couldn’t get away with merely calling them “protestors”. They needed to escalate that to “insurrectionists” and “seditionists”, both of which will be struck down in temperate courts, but not when adjudicated by the likes of Amit Mehta, a child of the incredibly corrupt Indian nation, and not anyone who has any respect for our history or founding.
Both my parents were descended from founding stock, and I have many ancestors who directly took part in the Revolution. Faced with my own people as my judge, I know they would respect all of what has gone before. The judges we have now are simply alien to us. Thus we have gotten the despicable bail decisions from politicized operatives who have a grudge against the Americans. As immigration is my central issue, this is one reason why: we never agreed to be arrested and judged by foreigners. We needed none of them, they begged to be allowed to live among us, and when we relented, they laughed and turned on us...which was always their plan.
Simply because we have our own problems doesn’t mean we have to accommodate Canada’s descent into Totalitarianism.
I firmly believe that "judges" are lesser nobility. Wasn't it the nobility that "held court" in the old days?