Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden SCOTUS nominee went beyond call of duty to defend terror suspects
justthenews.com ^ | Feb 25, 2022 | Aaron Kliegman

Posted on 02/26/2022 11:34:41 AM PST by gattaca

Ketanji Brown Jackson's defense of Gitmo detainees and criticism of U.S. government likely to be spotlighted in confirmation process.

0:00 / 0:00 By Aaron Kliegman Updated: February 25, 2022 - 11:37pm Article Dig In President Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court represented suspected terrorists when she was a federal public defender, going well beyond a bare-bones defense to lambaste the U.S. government for some if its counterterrorism policies and broader approach to the War on Terror.

Biden on Friday nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, currently a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.

Jackson's record will no doubt be heavily scrutinized in the coming days as the Senate prepares for its confirmation hearings. Perhaps no aspect of her past legal work will come under more scrutiny than her advocacy on behalf of prisoners detained at the Guantanamo Bay military prison as enemy combatants for their alleged role in terrorist activities.

During her time in the federal public defender's office, Jackson represented Guantanamo detainees who challenged their imprisonment in a federal court in Washington, D.C.

One of the most prominent cases involved Jackson representing Khiali-Gul, who the Defense Department said was a Taliban intelligence officer in charge of a terrorist cell planning to attack a U.S. base in Afghanistan in 2002. He may have also met with Osama bin Laden in November 2001, according to government documents.

The Defense Department assessed that if released Gul would immediately "seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities and extremist support activities."

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 200111; 2002; afghanistan; bidennominees; bleedingheartattack; gitmo; gotmo; gul; ketanjibrownjackson; khialigul; obl; onl; paulryan; scotus; supremecourt; taliban; terroristsympathizer; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2022 11:34:42 AM PST by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The source is Just the News, not Breitbart. I have informed the moderator. Sorry.


2 posted on 02/26/2022 11:36:27 AM PST by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

So she is a traitor who wanted to see more Americans murdered.


3 posted on 02/26/2022 11:37:23 AM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Why is this surprising?


4 posted on 02/26/2022 11:38:31 AM PST by SayNoToDems (Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Doesn’t matter, our girls in the Senate will still vote for her, Linda, Lisa, Susan and Ms. Misty Mittens.


5 posted on 02/26/2022 11:41:01 AM PST by Colo9250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SayNoToDems

Look, thats what lawyers are supposed to do. If they don’t go to whatever (legal) lengths necessary to defend their clients, then they aren’t doing their job.


6 posted on 02/26/2022 11:41:18 AM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
' Khiali-Gul, who the Defense Department said was a Taliban intelligence officer in charge of a terrorist cell planning to attack a U.S. base in Afghanistan in 2002. He may have also met with Osama bin Laden in November 2001, according to government documents. '

.Gov is always right, and never lies. So this must be true, because .gov says so.

7 posted on 02/26/2022 11:41:22 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Is this less than stellar judge who the Dems really intend to be on the bench, or do they want her voted down? They can then call Republicans racist and nominate someone more intellectually formidable, who could presumably not be rejected.


8 posted on 02/26/2022 11:43:50 AM PST by I-ambush (If we make it we’ll all sit back and laugh, but I fear tomorrow I’ll be crying )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
Jackson's record will no doubt be heavily scrutinized

Heavily sanitized is more likely.

9 posted on 02/26/2022 11:46:18 AM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

.
There are what 535 members of Congress.

3 of them will even care.


10 posted on 02/26/2022 11:46:57 AM PST by AnthonySoprano (And the Wuhan Flu came from a food market and Joe Biden comes from the black community )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

I do not know if she was involved in it, but one group of defense lawyers illegally gave identifying information on interrogators...home addresses, etc...to detainees.


11 posted on 02/26/2022 11:47:23 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I-ambush

No matter what, a liberal will be appointed.
Let “Stella get her groove on”, and hammer the Dems on everything else.
The timing of this isn’t an accident.


12 posted on 02/26/2022 11:48:50 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Not surprising at ALL in the DC “BLM” Circuit that included:

Emmett Sullivan and... Merrick Garland. Looney and probably queer activists of Leftist juris- NON prudence or Constitutionality of the “living docuemnt” changed from the Bench persuasion.


13 posted on 02/26/2022 11:49:42 AM PST by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

“So she is a traitor who wanted to see more Americans murdered.”

How about telling us something that makes her different than any other Democrat judge?


14 posted on 02/26/2022 11:50:18 AM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart, I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45; All

That isn’t an excuse to somehow miss the fact shes a radical liberal socialist who is at extreme odds with the constitution and our form of government.

It goes way beyond merely being a lawyer putting up the best defense for a client. Many lawyers do not choose to take certain clients, also.


15 posted on 02/26/2022 11:50:19 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

YAWN...Lindsey will be so excited he’ll wet his pants voting for her.


16 posted on 02/26/2022 11:51:12 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

GOA came out strongly against her.


17 posted on 02/26/2022 12:06:10 PM PST by donozark (Masochists for Biden. 2024.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark

I read that. They said even RINO Lindsey Graham thinks Biden’s nominee is a radical.


18 posted on 02/26/2022 12:10:30 PM PST by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
There's really nothing disqualifying in that report. She was representing Guantanamo prisoners and claimed the guards were super mean to them, humiliating them and not letting them sleep and such.

It was kind of her job, being a leftist lawyer and all that. I wouldn't vote for her, but I'm not a leftist.

19 posted on 02/26/2022 12:11:18 PM PST by dead (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_vFiUUcBkc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

But she’s Paul Ryan’s IN LAW, so she MUST be FABULOUS!/s


20 posted on 02/26/2022 12:11:20 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson