Yes, being against the foreign policy idiocy of Hillary Clinton, Victoria “cookie lady” Nuland, John McCain, and Adam Kinzinger makes one a Putin supporter. /s
None of them probably like cancer, headaches, or traffic jams either, so you are a Hillary supporter if you don’t dislike those things.
While as seen in my posts above, I see NATO as warranted due Putin's unwarranted aggressiveness, however, as I have said before, after the fall of the Soviet Union the West naively believed that democracy itself is the answer, which it is not, as only insomuch as the voters are wise Godly will they elect the same, while the Russian mafia much filled the void of Soviet corruption. And the morally decaying West failed to really rehabilitate and develop Russia and seemed to disrespect it in the Kosovo intervention.
And this sympathetic piece relates to it.
The Russian military was a mess. Instead of seizing the opportunity to create a new European order that included Russia, President Bill Clinton and his foreign-policy team squandered it by deciding to expand NATO threateningly toward that country’s borders. Such a misbegotten policy guaranteed that Europe would once again be divided, even as Washington created a new order that excluded and progressively alienated post-Soviet Russia.
From 1993, when discussions about it began in earnest, there was no one of significance to oppose them. Worse yet, the president, a savvy politician, sensed that the project might even help him attract voters in the 1996 presidential election, especially in the Midwest, home to millions of Americans with eastern and central European roots..
The alliance’s defenders now claim that Russia accepted it by signing the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act. But Moscow really had no choice, being dependent then on billions of dollars in International Monetary Fund loans (possible only with the approval of the United States, that organization’s most influential member). So, it made a virtue of necessity. That document, it’s true, does highlight democracy and respect for the territorial integrity of European countries, principles Putin has done anything but uphold.- https://www.thenation.com/article/world/nato-clinton-ukraine-russia/