[ptsal]

Despite the 2014 annexation of Crimea, Ukraine had cavalierly persisted with reaffirming its 1994 decision towards NPT. Calls by odd Ukrainian parliamentarians and security strategists to arm themselves, too, went unheeded. Instead, Vladimir Putin had brazenly invoked N-weapons in defending Crimea, just like he has again dangerously posited the language of nuclear weapons today. In 2019, Secretary of the Ukrainian National Security and Defence Council admitted “nuclear disarmament was a historic mistake” and that “guarantees given to us are not even worth the paper they are written on”. It was a classic case of fatally late realisation.

Ensuing drama of the hopeless Ukrainian situation validates the Indian perspective of securing its sovereign and strategic interests, and not falling for the NPT trap. As Kyiv desperately beseeches Delhi to intervene, memories of Ukraine condemning India’s nuclear re-testing (‘Operation Shakti’) in 1998 is a conveniently forgotten footnote. India has consistently charted its own security considerations beyond the NPT imperatives, which have delivered far more responsible outcomes than those of most NPT signatories.

[ClearCase_guy]

I believe Libya, like Ukraine, agreed to get rid of their WMD. They were destroyed soon after.

Any sensible country has WMD. Sad, but true. Self-defense is a core responsibility.

[BobL]

Ukraine can regret what they want, but Russia was NOT going to allow them to have/keep nuclear weapons, at any cost.

And while the Left (and their new-found friends on the right) keep trying to portray this as Putin’s ‘issue’, both Gorby and Yeltsin were just as clear on it.