Posted on 03/19/2022 4:21:21 PM PDT by joesbucks
WSJ article on Ivermectin study
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
Another trials designed to fail, I’ll bet.
There is far too much real life evidence that it works.
Uttar Pradesh is the big one.
PROBABLY because it was ILLEGAL or looked down on to prescribe it UNTIL people were IN the hospital and DYING!
“Another trials designed to fail, I’ll bet.”
Perhaps.
Thing is, nothing would either.
Same people would likely need hospitalization for a bad flu and nothing would treat that either.
I do not know why there seems to be no standard of care for Covid SARS.
It works fabulously.
I knocked out a bad case of the Red China virus in 24 hours.
The reporterette at the WSJ is just parroting the CDC and the NIH, and we all know how reliable those two entities are.
I’ve seen these corrupt big pharma trials many times over the decades. If a drug MUST NOT be mixed with grape jelly for it to be effective, by golly, every trial participant will be given a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch. Or if zinc nullifies the positive effect, by golly, all trial participants are fed foods high in zinc. Corrupt as hell.
Ping.
More info on the study here...
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/ivermectin-covid-coronavirus-study-hospitalizations/
McMaster University in Canada.
Okaaaay....
If they had something with which to treat it, there wouldn’t be need for lockdowns and masking and forcing vaxe$ on everyone. Or mail in voting.
It’s all about money and power and control.
If it were about health, people would actually be getting treated instead of being sent home and told to not seek medical care unless their lips are turning blue.
It kept me out of the hospital, that’s what really matters to me.
I read the study. There are some design flaws in the study that show it not to be the best designed But it is a large trial that points our that ivermectin is certainly not a silver bullet.
I continue to maintain it is a 2C recommendation. There is weak evidence to support that it is not harmful with possible minimal benefit.
Perhaps you should read the study before making guesses.
I believe it.
Do you have a link to the study? I can’t find any articles with a link to it, just the WSJ’s coverage.
I’ve been meaning to inquire about this for a while, and keep forgetting. This post reminded me.... I subscribe to both Steve Kirsch’s and Alex Berenson’s Substack alerts. Both authors were commenting on a recent Malaysian study of ivermectin, and they reached opposite conclusions based on the same data! Up to that point I had found both authors interesting and useful. Now I’m a little confused. Has anyone else seen these? Have any theories?
WSJ. Don’t trust anything they say.
Exactly. There is too much clinical evidence that it does work. Like all medications it will not work for everyone. It is also part of a treatment/preventative regimen. When used in protocols developed by doctors such as Paul Marik, MD. it does reduce severity of Covid. Best of all it has a low risk to high benefit.
Ivermectin has been deemed unprofitable by dnc cronies
Oh please. There has been zero study and research regarding Covid.
Safety cannot justify the use of ivermectin for the management of COVID-19
I don't know if this is the study, but McMaster is represented here, too, along with our Big Med. All with the same mad-on for Ivermectin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.