Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

January 6 Defendant Gloriously Acquitted — Is His Defense the Roadmap for Other Peaceful Protesters to Win Back Their Freedom?
The Liberty Daily ^ | Apr. 6, 2022 | J.D. Rucker

Posted on 04/06/2022 3:58:40 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

One of the most prominent points made by supporters of the political prisoners arrested following the mostly peaceful protest at the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, is that tons of video evidence shows law enforcement officers ushering in the protesters. If these people were breaking the law, doesn’t that mean the police were breaking it with them by pulling down the barricades, opening the doors, and ushering them in? Are we not supposed to listen to the instructions of law enforcement?

This premise was tested with glorious results for January 6 defendant Matthew Martin. According to Sean Davis:

This acknowledgement of reality — that it’s not a crime to walk through a door held open for you by police — is fatal to the corrupt government’s entire J6 narrative. It’s also why DOJ has criminally abused defendants to force plea deals: DOJ knows its cases are garbage.

Davis may be onto something. The Department of Justice has been gung ho with charges and arrests and have claimed to be applying the full force of the law against people they have dubbed “insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists.” But they’ve been just as quick to quietly make plea deals with as many as possible. This isn’t the standard practice of clearing a docket through negotiations. They have always seemed to be in a very big rush to get as many as possible to admit wrongdoing even if it meant far lighter sentences.

Was it all a con because they knew they had no real cases against most of the defendants?

(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 20210106; capitolpolice; capitolriot; deminsurgency; dissent; j6; jan6; january6; january6th; matthewmartin; pelosiscoup; politicalprisoners; protest; trevormcfadden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2022 3:58:40 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes. It’s totalitarianism. Political persecution.

Years and huge amounts of money to prosecute misdemeanors.


2 posted on 04/06/2022 4:02:26 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sadly, if a defendant is in the court of a Rat Judge, this “roadmap” will be completely ineffective along with any other defense. In those courts, these cases are guilty not until proven innocent, just guilty. Also know as Star Chambers or Kangaroo Courts.


3 posted on 04/06/2022 4:03:53 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You remember how right wingers use to say, it’s coming to America soon.

Well, it has come and here we are...seemingly powerless to do anything about it..?


4 posted on 04/06/2022 4:06:39 PM PDT by Leep (Freedom: "What's the big deal" -joe biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Invitation -- freely offered by nothing less than the Capitol's legal enforcement authority, the USCP -- is an absolute defense to Federal trespass.


5 posted on 04/06/2022 4:10:06 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the goosestepping parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

Correct.


6 posted on 04/06/2022 4:13:38 PM PDT by sauropod (So may we start? It's time to start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I read elsewhere that this was a bench trial. What happened to having a jury trial? Or would a jury in Washington DC be too politically biased.


7 posted on 04/06/2022 4:22:13 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magooey

I worked in DC. It would be like being judged by a jury of Jerry Springer guests.


8 posted on 04/06/2022 4:29:12 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“... Are we not supposed to listen to the instructions of law enforcement?”

Reliance on instructions from a government official is one of the cases in which ignorance of the law IS an excuse in the NY Penal Code.


9 posted on 04/06/2022 4:34:06 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (January 6, worst assault on democracy since the Reichstag Fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magooey
"I read elsewhere that this was a bench trial. What happened to having a jury trial? Or would a jury in Washington DC be too politically biased."

Drew the golden ticket in a Trump judge who is actually qualified to be a judge. You would trade that away for a jury of DC ferals?

10 posted on 04/06/2022 4:35:52 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Enjoy the goosestepping parade of Putlim Soviet c!rclejerkers lining up for the Tedlim-style putsch )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: magooey

This should never reach a jury. When there’s no triable issue of facts, summary judgment is called for. And getting let in by the Capitol Police is grounds for at least partial summary judgment, and dismissal provided one behaved lawfully while in the Capitol.


11 posted on 04/06/2022 4:38:06 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (January 6, worst assault on democracy since the Reichstag Fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Can he sue for false incarceration now ?


12 posted on 04/06/2022 5:00:51 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: magooey

Bench trial with a Trump appointed judge is the best shot as DC jurors are by definition biased communists .


13 posted on 04/06/2022 5:02:36 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus
This case the defendant got lucky.
judge Trevor McFadden Appointed by Donald Trump
14 posted on 04/06/2022 5:36:06 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Was it all a con because they knew they had no real cases against most of the defendants?”

Yep, it’s the classic DA strategy to threaten a really long sentence to scare the defendants into accept a plea deal.


15 posted on 04/06/2022 6:03:33 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It was a bench trial before a judge who had found another defendant guilty in a different trial. So it’s hard to see a legal tactic in this.


16 posted on 04/06/2022 6:07:17 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

In our legal system, the process is half the punishment, or in this case, all of the punishment!


17 posted on 04/06/2022 6:45:38 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

And now there is standing precedent.


18 posted on 04/06/2022 6:48:03 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Was it all a con because they knew they had no real cases against most of the defendants?

That must be a rhetorical question. :)

19 posted on 04/06/2022 8:18:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (Is it time for a general strike yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Thank. God.

One. ONE decent judge in DC. They are known to be the guardians of Democrats there. I mean it is really, really bad, according to lawyers.

Years and years of the Uniparty rubber stamping lib justices in DC. Elsewhere, it’s not as bad, as often a Senator will axe lunatics behind the scenes, for their own territories. But DC has nobody from our side lookinout for Patriots.

It’s also high profile area, the highest, so judges go out of their way to loudly hammer deplorables.

So good for this one!


20 posted on 04/06/2022 8:20:19 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Putin is behaving rationally.The war is on Biden and Obama. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson