Posted on 04/07/2022 6:01:06 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
1. Any Senator voting to confirm KJB is pro-pedophile just like she is.
There are MANY more qualified black women judges, that actually can define what a woman is, but Biden chose the one that protects evil child predators.
And then Romney, Murkowski, and Collins vote for her.
10:40 PM · Apr 4, 2022
-----------------------------------------------------
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
Murkowski, Collins, and Romney are pro-pedophile.
They just voted for KBJ.
9:13 PM · Apr 4, 2022
(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...
MTG spoke the truth.
For Anita Hill, Cruz’s fixation on critical race theory stood out.
“A confirmation hearing should be about learning how a person will judge, not how well she handles specious browbeating,” she wrote in her Washington Post op-ed about Cruz’s line of questioning.
We’ll never know how many pedos there are. I didn’t realize how many altered ‘genders’ they say there are. I knew there were those that have both, but just ‘WOW!
She did indeed. What the heck is the matter with these three jerks?
They turned that story into a hit piece against anyone who would voice a negative opinion of her.
Senator Tom Cotton criticized Jackson for defending terrorism suspects at Guantánamo Bay prison
In summing up his opposition to Jackson’s confirmation, Cotton compared her in an unfavorable light with former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who participated in the Nuremberg trials.
“The last Judge Jackson left the Supreme Court to go to Nuremberg and prosecute the case against the Nazis. This Judge Jackson might have gone there to defend them.”
Yep.
Well, the Supreme Court has its token racist bimbo.
Are other arguments given besides the pedophile thing?
WOW!
I didn’t see anything about the ‘natural rights’ topic in the article which came up during her ‘interview’ but then I also didn’t know that AOL was still a thing post 1994.
Done deal, right?
Either way, we were going to get a ‘rubber stamp’. But damn have they rubbed our noses in it. I’ve seen women and she is not one.
"I have no opinion one way or another about natural law or unalienable rights"
That just told us a huge amount about how she will judge, Anita. go back to looking for pubic hairs in your coke.
She absolutely did.
The bigger question is:
‘WHY ARE THEY CONFIRMING A JUDGE TO THE SUPREME COURT WHEN THERE ARE STILL 9 SITTING JUDGES???’
Is this the beginning of their packing the Supreme Court without even an Amendment to make it legal??
Hey girl, tell us how you tried to back shoot Clarence Thomas after he married a white woman instead of you. Black slut
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.