[cgbg]

For those who don’t know, there is a non-religious version of Intelligent Design.

It claims that Creation is a simulation.

(Of course nobody knows who or what did the simulation.. :-) )

Even is you disagree with the hypothesis, it is important because it allows non religious scientists to accept Intelligent Design as “non crazy”.

[TexasGator]

“For those who don’t know, there is a non-religious version of Intelligent Design.”

Another God?

[Boogieman]

There’s another version too, which is basically “aliens made us”, but that’s just moving the goalposts really.

[aquila48]

“For those who don’t know, there is a non-religious version of Intelligent Design.”

ID is not grounded on or invokes religion. They make their case strictly on scientific grounds and methodology.

If you’re curious how they do it, I recommend “Signature in the Cell” by Stephen Meyer.