To: combat_boots
There is no need for an 18 year old to have body armor. Body armor is not protected by the second amendment. He could have been stopped sooner if not for his body armor. This is where legislation needs to go.
66 posted on
05/25/2022 5:55:41 AM PDT by
LOC1
(Its the Economy, Stupid ! )
To: LOC1
COME AND TAKE MY BODY ARMOR.
69 posted on
05/25/2022 5:57:04 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Hold on, y'all, 2022 is going to be a ride you won't soon forget!)
To: LOC1
Lol. How you gonna keep a steel plate out of an 18 year old’s hands?
83 posted on
05/25/2022 6:36:50 AM PDT by
Levy78
(Reject modernity, embrace tradition. )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson