Posted on 05/31/2022 10:35:13 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
if a person believes that an attorney has acted unethically, that person may file a complaint against the lawyer simply by submitting a signed, written statement setting forth a clear, concise statement of the facts and circumstances of the alleged misconduct. No special legal knowledge is needed to file one. The complainant should provide copies of any documentary evidence that supports the claim and include the names and addresses of any witnesses who can support the allegations of the complaint.
Complaints against attorneys cannot be made anonymously. They must be in writing and be signed by the complainant. They may be made on a complaint form (PDF) available on this site or may be made in the form of a letter to the appropriate attorney grievance committee. The complainant must provide an address and telephone number at which they can be reached.
If the attorney is admitted to the bar of New York but does not maintain an office in this state, the complaint may be filed with any attorney grievance committee and, if necessary, it will be transferred to an appropriate committee in the judicial department of the Appellate Division in which the lawyer was admitted to the practice of law.
Registration Number: 2352771 Name: MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN Business Name: PERKINS COIE LLP Business Address: 700 13th St NW Washington, DC 20005-3960 Business Phone: (202) 654-6333 Email: Date Admitted: 06/20/1990 Appellate Division Department of Admission: 2nd Law School: BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL Registration Status: Attorney - Due to Register within 30 Days of Birthday Next Registration: May 2022
Overwhelm their system. It’s been working great for their side so far.
Sussman has more cred than ever now. He is a hero of the democrats.
Good greaf, give it the heck up!!!
Anit crap gonna happen to anyone in the swamp including Q backed Durham!
Are they still gonna allow that Q BS here after this? What a friggn JOKE, waste of TIME and waste of TAX PAYER monies!!!
Just like Mueller this Durham investigation (if you can call it that) a friggn farce!
he may have been found not guilty but he certainly knew what he was doing was wrong
And he helped set up a 2 year witch hunt
Durham threw this trial and he did it deliberately.
Period.
L
Durhamdid not throw the trial. He knew Sussman would be found not guilty with an Obama Judge and a D.C. jury.
He had to try this case in D.C. because that’s where the crime was committed. That’s why they was only one charge in the D C. case.
Durham did get some very helpful admissions during the trial that can be used in the following trials in much more friendly districts
“He had to try this case in D.C. because that’s where the crime was committed.”
Bull. It’s called a change of venue and every prosecutor has the right to request one.
L
They didn’t even try to hide it, did they...
Nope.
“It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.” Carlin.
L
Ok loser. Just give up because one move didn’t seem to work optimally? Now a winner will persevere, as the court of public opinion grows ever stronger and the information that came out as a result of the trial will add to the torrent of truth that will wash away the liars that are threatening our way of life. Maybe you should get out of the way.
Can Cankles be included?
Defendants can request a change in venue. A prosecutor cannot force a change in venue. If the defendant refuses, there will be no change in venue.
Why did he not object to such obviously biased jurors?
L
The prosecutor probably did, or realized that it wouldn’t make any difference. Prosecutors only have so many peremptory challenges, and the Judge was so biased, he wasn’t going to grant any motion to dismiss a juror for cause.
There was never a chance Sussmann was going to be convicted in this case in a district where 95+% of the voters voted for Hillary, just like the O.J Simpson jury wasn’t going to convict him. Prosecutors in the O.J. trial should have never agreed to move his trial to downtown L.A. If O.J. had been prosecuted in Santa Monica where the trial should have been conducted, he would have been found guilty.
What are YOU a Q freak thinking things are gonna get better MAGICALLY.
I am watching the world around me and am smart enough to KNOW that unless a VETO proof congress after the elections aint nothing gonna change.
Next time read up on who the Judge and Jurors are.
Defendants can request a change in venue. A prosecutor cannot force a change in venue.
Correct. A defendant is constitutionally entitled to a trial in the state and judicial district where the crime took place. Therefore only the defendant can waive that provision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.