There are many out there like her, who are too biased to know just how biased they are, too misinformed to know how misinformed they are, and so ideological such that they feel justified in lying, stealing votes, etc. - as long as their ‘side’ comes out on top.
That jury saw the deep state protection racket up close and personal for too long to play nice anymore. This was a middle finger to corrupt “Feds Inc.”.
Bias was certainly a huge part of it, but so is idiocy. I have been on juries where I hear people speak as she did that "the prosecution did not prove its case". They practically expect a video showing the crime or "it wasn't proven". Beyond a reasonable doubt has become beyond the shadow of a doubt for these idiots. Also, some people on juries (often women) just don't feel comfortable judging anyone.