It all depends on what the definition of “shall not be infringed” means...take your time its unconstitutional you GOP turncoats!
“It all depends on what the definition of “shall not be infringed” means...”
No. It depends on what the definition of “the right of the people to keep and bear arms” means.
If they make a case that something is not within the meaning of “the right of the people to keep and bar arms”, then they make a case that laws against that something aren’t an infringement.