[Dilbert San Diego]

Well, our wise Latina shows her ignorance, as “separation of church and state” is not in the constitution. It is not a constitutional commitment(her words) in the first place.

[wbarmy]

Yeah, I caught that bit about “constitutional commitment” also. This from the woman who has no idea about anything pretty much.

[alstewartfan]

The wise Latina hates the Constitution, and regards ordinary people as helpless.

[Basket_of_Deplorables]

Wide Latina.

[griswold3]

Exactly. Funny how the Left only likes Church and State enjoined when the church Carrie’s out the States bidding.
See : Catholic Social Services and illegal immigration.

[gitmo]

Well, our wise Latina shows her ignorance, as “separation of church and state” is not in the constitution. It is not a constitutional commitment(her words) in the first place.

See my post 54.

[coincheck]

Agreed, and the 1st amendment regarding religion only limits Congress from establishing a national religion. It does not separate the church from the state.
The original 13 states had official state religions, ie, puritan, Baptist, catholic, Quaker, Lutheran….:
And, church services used to be held in the capital building regularly.
My, how far we have drifted away from the real meaning of the amendments and limitations placed on the federal government.