Posted on 07/03/2022 1:23:48 PM PDT by McGruff
She went to the highest bidder
Misleading. She saying it was BS that she had to deal with it. Not that the committee was BS, which it is.
Lying sack of stupid
I read a few days back that she had spoken with the committee months ago, they thanked her for speaking and that was the end of it, she had NOTHING useful to say..but after meeting with CNN analyst Alyssa Farah(She’s the schmuck/turncoat that worked under Trump but now hates him) they spoke and guess what..Hutchinson had a revelation, one of those amazing things that just happened out of the blue..doesnt take a genius to figure out what happened
I see more distracted driving than usual. I don't know if it's their phones or they're sleep driving or what. At WalMart (when I go there), they're in a daze. They walk aimlessly with no purpose. Many severely obese with a cart full of sodas and chips. Society is de-evolving and going backwards. Maybe it's the vaccine?? It's spooky.
Don’t ya just hate anonymous sources? Dear Redacted.
Person or People of Color. Which is everyone since no one is colorless, not even albinos.
She was calling the process of being served bs and having to deal with it.
I know that is the most ordinary meaning, but, in this context, she was looking for legal advise from a Republican group, but ended out securing someone from the dems, via one former Trump White House staffer, Alyssa Farah (now at CNN). Things progressed along to more remembrances like a tossed blood-red ketchup-laden lunch, and on to a “warm embrace” with Liz Cheney.
And Mr Schlapp can change his tune. American Conservative Union founder and CPAC chair Matt Schlapp lied to the American people, admitting in an interview with Axios that Joe Biden was the winner of the 2020 election. Schlapp told Axios, “Joe Biden is my President, and I want him to succeed.” He went on to say “Look, Biden is in the White House, he won the election.”
Yep, I saw that too. But everybody else is falling for this clickbait.
Got away with lying under oath. Will do it again some day.
I think everyone knows what she means. The point is that she wanted to deal with the “BS” with the counsel from one side before she sought it from the other side - kind of John Kerry-like.
You have quite an imagination.
“the process of being served bs”
She did not call the committee BS ? No the implication of her statement is that the committee was BS, if it were not BS why would she object? She simply stated what anyone with half of brain already new.
Are you not tired of the se democRat witchhunts?
But of course
Show me where she specifically said the committee is bs. It’s very open ended. A lot of people see the impaneling of a jury as needed and necessary, but having to deal with serving, especially if busy, is seen as bs. So again, show me where she specifically called the panel bs.
Or got blackmailed.. Put nothing past those with vicious ambition unbridled by ethics - such as Liz Cheney.
LOL, please this has nothing to do with jury duty! This was the democRat’s congressional witch hunt.
Her job was to discredit the J6 committee.
She showed how poorly researched the J6 committee’s data and witnesses are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.