To: Sioux-san
SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance shall not be affected therebyBS
6 posted on
07/29/2022 7:51:07 PM PDT by
frogjerk
(I will not do business with fascists)
To: frogjerk
They know it’s unconstitutional.
7 posted on
07/29/2022 7:52:27 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: frogjerk
The law as written says it is exclusive and greater than the US Constitution?
9 posted on
07/29/2022 7:55:12 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: frogjerk
Attempting to “in before” the SC strikedown, lol
To: frogjerk
This is their favorite thing to do now, include a severability clause.
And nobody stops them.
14 posted on
07/29/2022 8:01:09 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
To: frogjerk
Re BS and The severability clause.
It is ubiquitous in legislation and contracts. Failure to include a severability clause is tantamount to malpractice.
18 posted on
07/29/2022 8:14:31 PM PDT by
thegagline
(Sic semper tyrannis )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson