[Dr. Franklin]

Can this be reversed due to the failure to follow the rules?

Can the WI GOP decide to replace Voss with a different candidate?

Reposting after inadvertently copying the social media links with the headline from GP.

[truthkeeper]

No mention of his opponent filing a challenge or even being a part of this action. Typical.

[Parley Baer]

“Can this be reversed due to the failure to follow the rules?”

That is the whole thing right there. They are not following the rules or going before a “friendly” judge to get the rules changed on the day of the vote.

[es345st]

So the guy who refused to take any action when it was known there was cheating wins by cheating. Full circle.

[Dr. Franklin]

For those who didn't read until the end of the article, here is the meat of the story:

How Racine is Violating State Law: For the August 9th primary, the Racine City Clerk allowed 21 alternate absentee ballot locations (not centrally located but scattered throughout the city) and the majority of which provided an advantage to the Democratic Party because they were located in the most Democratic parts of the City. This is documented in a new WILL analysis.

Additionally, state law says that if a city uses alternate sites then “no function related to voting and return of absentee ballots that is to be conducted at the alternate site may be conducted in the office of the municipal clerk or board of election commissioners.”

For the August 9th primary, 21 sites were designated where an election van visited for 3 hours before moving to another site over the course of two weeks prior to election day. The Racine City Clerk allowed absentee voting at both the 21 alternate sites and at City Hall where the Clerk’s Office is located.

The law apparently prohibits using alternate sites for election activities which provide an advantage to any political party. In this case its a primary, so they will likely argue that no advantage was provided to the Dems by stuffing ballots for a Republican. This actually pertains to the Uniparty rigging elections, i.e., the Dem machine "finds" the votes for a nominal Republican to keep a rigged system in place. So, in short, the Dems interfered in the Republican primary. If this stands, President Trump himself should lead the charge to write in the guy who lost to this Dem enabled RINO.

[mewzilla]

WI related...

Wisconsin places inactive voters back on rolls, key lawmaker calls it 'mind-boggling'