It’s only taken DHS 11 years since it’s inception after 9/11 for the federal government to become one of tyranny.
Department of How to Silence.
Legacy tech firms are captives of and partners with the Deep State. However, more people are bypassing Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc., for new tech sites like Rumble, Brave, Truth Social, etc. Like the abandonment of the MSM 10-15 years ago, the big platforms are slowly losing their dominance.
Both are long reads as the whole thing is a deep dive investigative series but it's about the DHS censoring it's own citizens on elections, COVID, criticism of the government etc so it's kinda important.
Here's the money shot/phrase
So again, just like the examples in Part 1, DHS is implementing a US government policy to ban online speech that challenges a US government policy.
When North Korea engages in this practice, the US State Department calls for sanctions. In 2017, the US Treasury Department actually did impose sanctions on North Korea for “censorship activities” that blocked criticism of the government:
Once upon a time, this would make a good episode of 60 Minutes
Well worth going and reading the whole thing. Great find Pollard. I am going to preserve it in whole in case it disappears.
DHS would never be in existence, the people would never have agreed to it if it weren’t for 911, makes you think doesn’t it. Another solution to a crisis generated by the criminals
“As this speaker describes, her group reported 639 social media posts directly to DHS’s “cyber mission control”, giving them privileged access to social media censorship teams via a special relationship with senior DHS officials. 72% of those 639 posts were reported to DHS, and then on to Big Tech censors, because targeted citizens were “casting doubt on the integrity of the election outcome”, via criticism of things like the viability of drop boxes and mail-in ballots.
DHS coordinated censorship at both ends, connecting the social media monitors who reported posts to the social media platforms who banned those posts. The US government, in effect, censored the ability to “cast doubt” on the US government.”
Does this mean the social media sites can be sued for violating the first amendment?
If I were younger I would leave the United States.
The heads of the social media are mostly committed leftists, and were very eager to use their resources to help the government identify dissenters and to silence them.
The government didn’t need to pay the heads a visit, but did anyway. Now the social media are de facto arms of the government, recording what we post, what we send in a “private” message, who we associate with and other information that a fascistic repressive regime can use to locate anyone who doesn’t bow down and profess adoration for the official party line.
George Orwell would be surprised that the regime has progressed so far into totalitarianism.
Time to dump DHS. It has become the toilet scum of a deep state toilet.
Power over what’s disseminated isn’t power over what everyone knows. Obama knew he was despised even by his own party and media hacks. That’s why he is so bitter.
DHS is another agency that should be abolished.
George Bush knew what he was doing...
Nothing would stand in his desire to reunite Mexico with all its lost territories...
Defacto invasion was the key...
It is working...
Just have to make sure the serfs are effectively chained up and silenced...
DHS leads the way...