Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gorbachev as an ultimately tragic figure
Asia Times ^

Posted on 08/31/2022 4:22:54 AM PDT by FarCenter

Few world leaders have cut a more consequential but ultimately tragic figure than Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, whose death at the age of 91 has been announced by Russian state media.

In a way, it was fitting that as the last leader of the USSR, Gorbachev was probably its only truly humane one. And it’s equally sobering that Gorbachev has passed away at a time when political repression in his native Russia has become stifling once more, and the specter of conflict in Europe which long overshadowed the region during the Cold War has become reality.

These were outcomes Gorbachev strived to avert. He was a man who became associated with opening up Soviet society, encouraging hope and debate rather than stifling it. He sought to revitalize the USSR, foreseeing a coming century of peace in which the Soviet Union joined a “Common European Home.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gorbachev; mikhailgorbachev; ussr
Gorbachev's desire for Russia to become part of Europe was never going to happen, no matter how democratic and free market it could become.

A free market, democratic Russia as part of the EU would be the most populous, largest, and most influential member of the EU. This would seriously dilute the power of Germany, France, Italy, Spain and especially the UK.

The US could not let this happen, and since the UK was an EU member, the US and UK worked assiduously to ensure that it would never come to be.

1 posted on 08/31/2022 4:22:54 AM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

In other words, we’ve become like the British Empire at the height of her powers in the 18th century, tinkering & forever scheming in world affairs with disastrous results, gaining prosperity through sheer force and often in spite of ourselves.


2 posted on 08/31/2022 4:30:47 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Gorb .. turd


3 posted on 08/31/2022 4:37:28 AM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

That was the outcome of WW I&II.

The United States became the senior partner in the alliance with the UK, and as the sun set on the British Empire and colonies detached themselves, the United States assumed governance of the world through financial manipulation backed by the US military, rather than through direct political control. Direct political control of an Empire had proved too expensive to implement.

This was the basis for the UN, Bretton Woods, NATO, the Five Eyes agreement, etc. Any resistance to the “merger and acquisition” was quashed during the Suez Canal Crisis when Eisenhower basically told the UK and France to sit down and shut up.


4 posted on 08/31/2022 4:42:09 AM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
Russia was looking for someone who could cope with Reagan and Gorbachev was Russian leader number 4 to face him, Russia had lost their best opportunity to attack the West in 1984 and Reagan had been reelected by 49 states that year, NATO was strong, the massive anti-war movement in Europe ignored by Reagan, Afghanistan was a disaster for the Russian military, and Reagan had invaded Grenada, showing resolve.
""Reagan offered to cancel the US deployments if Moscow would withdraw all SS-20s—the “Zero Option.” The arms control clerisy considered the idea “unrealistic,” designed to score propaganda points. They were wrong. After the US began to deploy intermediate-range nuclear forces weapons in late 1983, the Soviets folded. The Zero Option became the core of the 1987 INF Treaty. In a few years, all such weapons were gone. Their elimination constituted a key step toward liquidation of the Cold War.""

5 posted on 08/31/2022 4:55:29 AM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter
Gorbachev was a stone communist, who was just pragmatic enough to see that continuing the cold war would completely bankrupt the USSR. And yet we're all supposed to get all misty when people talk about how he "ended the cold war".

*spit*

6 posted on 08/31/2022 5:14:40 AM PDT by LIConFem (I lost my tagline in a boating accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

To the Left, Reagan wasn’t worth a cup of warm spit, but Gorbachov must be canonized as a saint.

His main feature is he wasn’t old, broken down, and decrepit when he was General Secretary.

Yeah. Gorbachov was “responsible for ending the Cold War” in the same way Hirohito was responsible for ending WWII...he occupied the seat of power in a defeated nation.


7 posted on 08/31/2022 5:20:12 AM PDT by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

—> political repression in his native Russia has become stifling once more,

Yeah, that will never happen here /s


8 posted on 08/31/2022 5:34:42 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Fraud vitiates everything. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

https://spectator.org/mikhail-gorbachev-dies-meets-maker/

A much better assessment here.


9 posted on 08/31/2022 6:15:31 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Tragic? The guy got filthy rich after he lost power.


10 posted on 08/31/2022 6:16:13 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Tragic? The guy got filthy rich after he lost power.

And was allowed to live in one of America's most expensive and scenic cities...until the dems allowed it to be trashed.

11 posted on 08/31/2022 6:19:21 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LS

Thanks. That sort of explains why Gorbachev, unlike Deng Xiaopeng, was unable to hold things together in ‘89.


12 posted on 08/31/2022 6:29:39 AM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Gorby and the Gipper:

A little different take than that of the worshipful Hoax News Media.

https://larrys.substack.com/p/gorby-and-the-gipper


13 posted on 08/31/2022 7:01:08 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

Yay, Gorby! God imprinted an image of what Russia will look like in the year 2200 atop Gorby’s head. Who says God doesn’t have a sense of humor?


14 posted on 08/31/2022 7:07:20 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

very interesting read. Thanks.


15 posted on 08/31/2022 8:59:30 AM PDT by kristinn (Serving ten to life in paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Gorbachev, Yeltsin ( the deceased drunken Bolshevik) and the whole criminal gang that surround Putin are all thieves.


16 posted on 08/31/2022 11:32:01 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson