Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge GRANTS Trump’s request to have a special master review documents seized in Mar-a-Lago raid - as its revealed FBI agents took medical records from ex-President’s home
Daily Mail ^ | September 5, 2022 | Geoff Earle

Posted on 09/05/2022 9:15:55 AM PDT by SamAdams76

A federal judge in Florida has granted Donald Trump's request to have a special master review the documents seized during the raid on Mar-a-Lago – granting a key demand of the former president and tapping the breaks on the government's investigation.

Judge Aileen Cannon approved Trump's motion to appoint a special master 'to review the seized property for personal items and documents and potentially privileged material subject to claims of attorney client and/or executive privilege.'

The Trump-appointed judge also 'temporarily enjoins' the government from 'reviewing and using the seized materials' pending the completion of the review.

That grants Trump and his legal team a side benefit of stalling the fast-moving proceedings that have unfolded since the August 8 FBI search of Mar-a-Lago.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2; aileencannon; bagpipes; billbarr; braking; cannon; creepstate; deepstate; doj; fbi; fishingexpedition; geoffearle; hh2; maralago; merrickgarland; pantyraid; persecution; policestate; raid; singlepartystate; specialmaster; trump; tyranny; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: SamAdams76

Great news on this Labor Day. 🙂 👍


21 posted on 09/05/2022 9:30:32 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim W N

Wouldn’t the Special Master have to see the original document citing the reason for the raid otherwise they would not know if documents and articles gathered were valid.


22 posted on 09/05/2022 9:31:13 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

Let me guess, Judge Amy Vermin Jackson?


23 posted on 09/05/2022 9:33:18 AM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

didn’t John Roberts say something about, how there are no Trump judges, or Obama judges, or Biden judges, that judges are special, and apply the law impartially, or something along those lines????


24 posted on 09/05/2022 9:35:02 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mware

“Heard it could take months.”

I heard YEARS! After the 2024 election at least...


25 posted on 09/05/2022 9:35:49 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell

I agree. I’m a federal employee and have worked with a Special Master before. Quite leftist in his approach from what I could tell.


26 posted on 09/05/2022 9:36:15 AM PDT by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

https://youtu.be/Z-7VZnxfoZM

I post this just so folks can remember what absolute hypocrisy comes from the CommirCrats.


27 posted on 09/05/2022 9:37:24 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (1218 - NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Bill Barr on a frantic search for his next full bottle of Pepto Bismal.


28 posted on 09/05/2022 9:37:54 AM PDT by lee martell ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

John Roberts also said a fine was a tax.


29 posted on 09/05/2022 9:40:27 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

DOJ blocked from using items seized at Mar-A-Lago…


30 posted on 09/05/2022 9:40:44 AM PDT by Beave Meister (Leave the gun. Take the cannoli....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment IV.

The 4th Amendment requires a showing of probable cause of a crime AT THE TIME of the search/seizure. Third-world dictatorships show all kinds of evidence after the fact.

But that is not how our Free Constitutional Republic works. The Constitution is essentially and anti-government and strict government-limiting document forcing the government to plainly show what they are up to BEFORE they attempt an search or seizure.

31 posted on 09/05/2022 9:42:09 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Great News!


32 posted on 09/05/2022 9:43:03 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince of Space

Good to remember.. as they are wrong /subject to much wishful thinking a lot.


33 posted on 09/05/2022 9:43:11 AM PDT by Track9 (You are far too inquisitive not to be seduced…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

This throws a big monkey wrench into fedgov’s plan. How long will it take to find a special master with appropriate security clearance to review this stuff?


34 posted on 09/05/2022 9:44:47 AM PDT by 6ppc (Democrats would have to climb Everest to reach the level of "scum of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
We're long past the point where the evidence is tainted, no matter who looks at it now.

On the day of the raid, job one for the FBI was to evict Trump's lawyers and any security people, and turn off the cameras.

Why? So there would be NO WITNESSES and no accountability for anything they did while inside. Since no one was there to document what they took, anything could have been added or altered, both at the site and anytime afterward. ANY evidence gathered is suspect and inadmissible, and a special master doesn't change that.

35 posted on 09/05/2022 9:44:51 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

(AP) - The appointment is likely to slow the pace of the department’s investigation into the presence of top-secret information at Mar-a-Lago given the judge’s directive that the Justice Department may not for the moment use any of the seized materials for investigative purposes. But it is not clear that it will have any significant effect on any investigative decisions or the ultimate outcome of the probe.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-mar-a-lago-government-and-politics-bc980316f80f88620b92e5666f96251c?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_1


36 posted on 09/05/2022 9:46:08 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

The judge’s footnote will leave a mark across the asses of both Garland and Wray.


37 posted on 09/05/2022 9:46:46 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince of Space
Shows how dumb they are....

Shows how biased they are...

38 posted on 09/05/2022 9:47:01 AM PDT by O6ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

WOW! Some good news for the day.


39 posted on 09/05/2022 9:47:07 AM PDT by Parley Baer (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HandBasketHell
The full 24-page document released today by the US District Court can be found here.

I skimmed through it and it does not appear it is very sympathetic to the government in this case. Some of the footnotes in fact were scathing.

40 posted on 09/05/2022 9:48:26 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (4,022,059 users on Truth Social)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson