Posted on 09/15/2022 9:24:48 PM PDT by DeweyCA
“Science” in the modern vernacular refers to a political ideology with a strong component of appeal to authority to quash debate.
As Someone said- they are masters at double speak-
their warped science (ie, biased opinion) says that there is no real definition for what a Woman is- Yet they turn right around and insist that a Man can be a Woman
Question authority, question yourself. Test ideas, by the evidence gained from observation and experiment, follow the evidence wherever it leads. And perhaps even the most important rule of all, remember you could be wrong.
Neil Degrasse Tyson
We have entered the Lysenko phase of the science!
Academic Lysenko was Stalin’s favorite scientist.
His crazy theories were taken as the Bible by the communists and totally destroyed Soviet Agriculture.
But, if you dare to protest, you got free trip to Siberia.
Tyson appears to believe profoundly in anthropogenic climate change.
>> Even psychologist and science author Steven Pinker, no friend of Christians or religious conservatives
An MIT cognitive sciences guy. Too bad he’s known to be a bigoted jackass. Fascinating author nonetheless.
Fascinating.
I’d heard the upgoing thermal radiation atmospheric window was relatively small. The assumption was that the impact of small increases in CO2 are magnified because it blocked that window.
The chart you posted shows the impact of CO2 is outside the window. Global warming attributed to a direct increase in CO2 is a scam.
Bottom line, Scientists and the science community is funded by these mental idiots in control
I have read an article, which explained that Galileo Galilei was an outlier.
Scientific consensus was 99% against him, and there were excellent scientific observations backing his opponents.
Galileo tortures were scientifically justified as he was definitely attacking the scientific consensus!
If we relied on Scientific consensus, we will still be in the middle ages.
Science indicates.
It is more so than ever:
Nothing you read and half of what you see.
Even while being totally against censorship, if anyone is ever to be censored, it should be Murray, for his misuse of statistics to “prove” his scientism. His reference to Pinker adds amusement, in that Pinker is equally guilty of statistical slight of hand.
NN Taleb has published several papers, on both of these clowns, that detail their statistical transgressions.
Nice chart. Right about methane. It only contributes to greenhouse effect in a totally dry atmosphere, like created in a laboratory bell jar. When idiots on the media say it is “60 times as powerful as CO2” or some such phoney number, Then “real science says” they’re full of it.
I learned my science in grade school/high school. Somebody is wrong here today about a great many things. This is evident where there is so much that is self explanatory yet the opposite is said to be the “science”.
A good friend pointed out many years ago that actually MUCH OF SCIENCE IS NOT SETTLED!
And actually science is CONTINUALLY LEARNING NEW THINGS THAT PROVE WHAT IT BELIEVED YESTERDAY WAS WRONG!
Great current example today is the Webb telescope - it’s really shaking up the astrophysicist world, causing some to stay awake all night thinking, “Is all I’ve believed all these years BEEN WRONG?!?” It is disproving a lot of old beliefs.
You’d think the science world would have some humility realizing their whole world is about disproving old science.
But no. And the Marxists hold science as being inviolate truth. WRONG!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.