To: ridesthemiles
"...The former First Lady’s statement is a response to Wolkoff leaking secretly recorded, out-of-context remarks..." Hm. You would think that would be generally forbidden in ANY context around the White House or the First Family. And would be severely punishable.
But apparently not.
3 posted on
09/25/2022 9:49:15 AM PDT by
rlmorel
(Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
To: rlmorel
It’s only punishable when a conservative reporter goes undercover on a liberal.
4 posted on
09/25/2022 9:56:12 AM PDT by
Fido969
(45 is Superman! )
To: rlmorel
she violated the confidentiality clause of her employment agreement
not sure what the penalty is for that other than firing
7 posted on
09/25/2022 10:02:18 AM PDT by
joshua c
(to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
To: rlmorel
Hm. You would think that would be generally forbidden in ANY context around the White House or the First Family. And would be severely punishable. But apparently not. Who knows what else she has secretly recorded that just hasn't made it's public appearance yet. What has she recorded that may be financially rewarding to her if she were to make it available to foreign agents?
8 posted on
09/25/2022 10:02:40 AM PDT by
BlackbirdSST
(Trump WON!!! The Gestapo closes ranks.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson