Lizzy Warren to go on WARPATH!.......................
I love the “Trump judges” and “Trumpiest” court angle. Trump appointed Federalist Society recommendations as judges just like every other Republican president for the past 40 years. Its one of the most consistent things he did as a Republican president. It works out great but the author trying to turn this into a “Trump” thing shows that he is either disingenuous or stupid.
Does anyone else find this sentence hilarious?
“a novel reading of an obscure provision of the Constitution”
Really??
The idea that a Federal agency would not be accountable to the people through their funding source is abhorrent to the principle of self-government.
Elizabeth Warren SPECIFICALLY said that she wanted the agency to be insulated from the influence of the people through the Congress.
But let’s hear more about “DEMOCRACY”
Likely their reasoning is that the agency grabbed powers that can only come through the legislature. Dozens of such agencies have given themselves limitless powers.
“novel and unexpected”
~~~
I have no clue if what this court just did is something I would agree with or disagree with. However, this language is ripe with the fishy smell of propaganda. Novel and unexpected interpretation of the constitution? Three of them? uh huh
It’s a start.
“...relies on a novel reading of an obscure provision of the Constitution,”
Translation: the Court is paying attention to what the Constitution actually says, not what liberals think it should say.
Quick! Somebody get cases about the ATF, FBI, CIA, NSA, HUD, etc, in front of these judges!
Cool! Now do the CDC.
I seems the intent of the Constitution is to keep the discrecionary power to spend money in the hands of the people. By giving agencies a “blank check” that is off the people’s annual appropriation books is a deceptive financial practice that borders on money laundering. Why did the Congress need to do this? Answer: The have allocated power to the administrative state that exceeds the intent of the Constitution.
“means simply that no money can be paid out of the Treasury unless it has been appropriated by an act of Congress.” >>>. The reason for this qualification is important. SO the agencies cannot bypass a regular approval process. They cannot be self perpetuating. That is the point and a self perpetuating funding scheme is unconstitutional at the federal level.
Good.
Congress delegated too many of its powers to bureaucratic “agencies” with regulation power that has the same power as law.
But it's just the tip of the iceberg.
80%+ - $3 trillion - of the federal government is unconstitutional! What do people think the "Deep State" and "The Swamp" is???
NUKE THE ENTIRE UNCONSTITUIONAL REGULATORY STATE (EPA, FAA, FCC, FTC, SEC, FEC) AND DEPTS OF EDUCATION, ENGERY, TRANSPORTATION, HHS, HOUSING, HUD, LABOR!!!
” a novel reading of an obscure provision of the Constitution”
LOL.
It created a non-elected executive branch, not subject to the authority of the executive branch and exempt from over site and funding control of Congress.
It violated the very three-branch framework of your Constitution in two ways.
“...a novel reading of an obscure provision of the Constitution”
The ORANGE MAN is coming back!!
There’s never been an obscure provision in the constitution I’ve read.
The truth would be in the open at last.
Predicted by those who know Constitional Law when the agency
was formed by Warren and the DS puppets/clowns.