Bannon Demands Arizona Refuse To Certify Election After Massive Election Errors Discovered

The Republic Brief ^ | 15/11/22 | Jeff Miller

[Eleutheria5]

What fools ye Conservatives be!

[Eleutheria5]

Evasion Grits: Ad hominem and stir.

[knarf]

Ther absence of THIS is why we have BEEN losing . . . why we lost . . . and why we will lose again

[newfreep]

No doubt the AZ SofS (Katie Hobbs) will follow Bannon’s advice.

Bottom line...as long as the Communists are in charge of “counting” the votes, the totalitarian police state will continue to grow.

[Mr. K]

I cannot believe the ‘Pravda’-type reporting from the media. They sunk to this level, so fast.

“The liar evil Bannon repeated the lying lies that his leader, the capitalist pig Trump, lied with the false claims about his election being ‘stolen’ from our glorious leader Biden, causing deaths and destruction when they viciously attacked our beloved capitol.”

[Dr. Franklin]

I don’t think McCain was winning all those elections for all those years either. McCain had the ability to stop Obama care and refused.
These stolen elections harm the entire country, no matter where they happen.
Anyone that would cheat in an election (R or D) is by definition a bad guy.
Bad guys do bad things.

The statistical analysis of AZ's voter rolls showed that the phantom voters increased greatly in time for the 2000 election. The implication is that the Maricopa machine stole AZ for Bush in 2000. Some people here won't want to believe that, but Gore was running on peace and prosperity, and AZ has a lot of senior citizens who wanted a president to protect Social Security. McCain also benefited, and knowing he couldn't lose an election, was free to be a "maverick" opposing his own party with disdain for its political base while doing the bidding of the corrupt MC machine.

[Eleutheria5]

“The media will always kiss the hand that slaps them.”—Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged*

* Caveat. I am not a Rand-y. Rand was a militant atheist, and while she had plenty of potential as a novelist, with Atlas Shrugged she jumped the shark, and the Fountainhead had plenty of sucky passages, too. I did like We, the Living, which was one of her first novels, and did draw on her personal experiences. But generally, she sucks.

[Eleutheria5]

They protest too much, constantly repeating the same BS, and I remain un-gas-lighted. The harder they try to gaslight me, the less convinced I become. Goebbels was wrong. The Big Lie does not sell unless there’s some elements of truth in it, carefully crafted and twisted. Says as much in the Zohar, The first book of Jewish mysticism, right in the Introduction. But just repeating a lie over and over counts for sh!t. Without a kernel of truth to exploit, it doesn’t work.

[Mr. K]

I don’t like her entire books, they bore me... but some passages within are pure and absolute genius.

[Eleutheria5]

Yes, it’s a pity she squandered her real potential trying to be a philosopher. Aside from boring, she’s just plain wrong about a lot of important things.

[ridesthemiles]

I have done accounting for over 65 years.

I COULD NEVER have such ‘ERRORS’.......