[Hostage]

Founders didn’t foresee the power of computer technology in rigging elections.

We know the solution; paper ballots, in-person voting, voter ID, etc. ......

BUT .....

each state would need to vote those measures in AND MAYBE .....

Have their governor sign into law.

Think PA, etc. Easier said than done.

I’m thinking a force will be needed to ambush and trap election riggers. Not sure there’s anyway around it, but here’s a thought, .....

Nationwide federal injunction against machines, mail-in ballots, .....

But corrupt states will plead Article II plenary powers, so feds can’t grant injunction, .....

Except FRAUD vitiates everything. SCOTUS would have to way in, can Article II be used to protect FRAUD?

[kvanbrunt2]

Founders didn’t foresee the power of computer technology in rigging elections.>>> Yes John Daly was a computer expert in Chicago around 1960.

[Political Junkie Too]

The Founding Fathers expected transparency in how our government operates. That's why:

1. Congress must keep a daily record of its activities (Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.),
2. the President shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union,
3. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.

The voter, too, should be held to some form of transparency, not in how they voted, but in who voted. As a civic duty, the voters should be made to assemble and publicly vote in a manner for all to see. No more mass mail-in voting, no internet voting, no anonymous voting. Anonymous votes, yes, but voting itself, no.

-PJ