Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

They had to negate invermectin as an effective treatment against COVID, because that’s the only way the vaccine-makers could get emergency approval

FDA rules say you can’t get that emergency approval if ANY other effective treatment already exists

so it was always all about the $$$$$ ... start investigating the vaccine-makers!!


16 posted on 12/01/2022 6:33:59 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: canuck_conservative

And there it is. First time I’ve heard that and it makes way more sense than anything else I’ve heard. Thank you. Do you know where I can find that FDA Rule?


25 posted on 12/01/2022 6:46:28 AM PST by Mathews (I have faith Malachi is right!!! Any day now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

As a clinical pharmacist (retired now) I trusted Pfizer, Astra-Zenaca, Merck, etc. My trust was misplaced. I did take the Pfizer two shots. In retrospect I wish I had not as subsequent information showed that statistically the shot was higher risk than the disease. I refuse to take a booster. The drug companies hid this data from the public. I caught covid despite the shot. I treated myself with ivermectin and it was like a mild cold.

It should be noted that the companies have blanket immunity when it comes to vaccines. The covid shot is not a vaccine despite the FDA changing the definition of a vaccine so it could classify the covid shot as a vaccine. This is about liability. Oddly I approve of the blanket immunity for vaccines. Otherwise they would refuse to make them. All vaccines have a risk benefit ratio. A few will get ill and or die. The benefits of polio, flu, smallpox, etc. vaccines far outweigh the risks. It was not so for the covid shot.

Since Pfizer etc. hid the data about adverse reactions I wonder if this negates their blanket immunity? Perhaps a lawyer on the forum can answer this. I do not know.

I would like to see Pfizer and the others sued and sued hard. I do not want to destroy Pfizer and the others. We need them. I want them hurt so bad that in the future they would never do this again. I want those that manipulated and hid data prosecuted. They are really guilty in my opinion of negligent manslaughter, fraud, and perjury. As the architect of this disaster that killed millions Dr. Anthony Fauci should be tried in The Hague for crimes against humanity. He is an evil man.


45 posted on 12/01/2022 7:30:09 AM PST by cpdiii (CANE CUTTER-DECKHAND-ROUGHNECK-OILFIELD CONSULTANT-GEOLOGIST-PILOT-PHARMACIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson