What theory of damages is he suing under. Did he sell a magazine with ten rounds to a mass shooter who shot twelve people instead of just ten? You can even shoot twenty people or even thirty with ten-round magazines. Just carry two or three of them to your psychotic episode.
SCOTUS...Unanimous decision...2016
AG Ferguson goes after law abiding citizen’s rights protected by the Federal and State Constitutions, but he refuses to prosecute judges and state Supreme Court Justices for whom he as uncontroverted proof of crimes against citizens he knows about.
I’m one of those victims.
One should also read up on Citizen Activist Tim Eymann AG Ferguson has been trying to destroy because Eymann is the Washington State Initiative King. In doing so, Ferguson and the Corrupt Judiciary are twisting statutory and ignoring US Circuit and SCOTUS decision that protect his constitution rights to petition the government, right to freedom of association, free speech, and to earn a living from personal donations to himself.
Ask Kyle Rittenhouse if 10 bullets was enough.
a large capacity magazine online is an unfair or deceptive act or practice or unfair method of competition in the conduct of trade or commerce for purposes of the consumer protection act
= = =
If criminals were limited to ten rounds also, then a citizen with more rounds has the unfair advantage, right?
Hey, if this is a law, just prosecute for that violation, why some lawsuit?
Distributing, selling, offering for sale, or facilitating the sale, distribution, or transfer of a large capacity magazine online is an unfair or deceptive act or practice or unfair method of competition in the conduct of trade or commerce for purposes of the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW. [2022 c 104 ยง 4.]
= = =
This says ‘online’. Many gun stores carry large capacity magazines, for sale to cops, or out of state, if their state is restrictive. So this ‘online’ part is not clear to me.
And is selling a 100 round mag more unfair competition than selling a 50 round mag?
It is impossible to make sense of an insane (not sane; not logical) law.
Bet there will be a big uptick of business at gun stores in Idaho. Wonder if Washington state will put checkpoints along the state line.
This is actually a good thing for the citizens if not so good for this gun store. The owner of the gun store how has iron clad standing to challenge the constitutionality of this unconstitutional law.
I have plenty of room in my mags, is this unequal application of the law? This law is clearly against the 2nd amendment.