Posted on 12/27/2022 1:30:49 PM PST by devane617
Why stop at the border? If you show a photo of them with embedded GPS metadata, the farther away you deliver them, the more you get paid, except if you take them to Canada, Mexico, or their home country.
Do that for a week and the rest will be running for the border themselves in order to avoid ending up in the farthest corner of the earth.
***********
Do all them border jumpers down Mexico way
need all the vacs as they cross?
I am sure you are right but the effect of his vote could have been a disaster if Roberts sided with the Libs too. Sullivan is a clear and present danger to the Republic.
Supreme Court keeps immigration limits in place indefinitely
Exactly! Makes one wonder about the quality of the info we are fed.
But Johnny R went correct so our side wins
Should have been 9 - 0.
“The brief court order said that while the administration cannot set aside the Title 42 policy, the decision “does not prevent the federal government from taking any action with respect to that policy.” “
If I read that right, the feds can continue ignoring it. It’s a policy the fed can use to keep the invaders out of they so desire, if they don’t want to use it they can just ignore it.
Or am I missing something?
Naw....Joe says to come on up...the border is open...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22a544_n758.pdf
I'm just surprised that Jackson joined him and not Kagan and Sotomayor who didn't join his opinion.
"JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE JACKSON joins, dissenting. From March 2020 to April 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention responded to the COVID–19 pandemic by issuing a series of emergency decrees. Those decrees—often called “Title 42 orders”—severely restricted immigration to this country on the ground that it posed a “serious danger” of “introduc[ing]” a “communicable disease.” 58 Stat. 704, 42 U. S. C. §265. Fast forward to a few weeks ago. A district court held that the Title 42 orders were arbitrary and capricious, vacated them, and enjoined their operation. On appeal, Arizona and certain other States moved to intervene to challenge the district court’s ruling, arguing that the federal government would not defend the Title 42 orders as vigorously as they might. The D. C. Circuit denied the States’ motion. In response, the States have now come to this Court seeking two things. First, the States ask us to grant expedited review of the D. C. Circuit’s intervention ruling. Second, the States ask us to stay the district court’s judgment while we review the D. C. Circuit’s intervention ruling. This stay would effectively require the federal government to continue enforcing the Title 42 orders indefinitely. Today, the Court obliges both requests. Respectfully, I believe these decisions unwise. Reasonable minds can disagree about the merits of the D. C. Circuit’s intervention ruling. But that case-specific decision is not of special importance in its own right and would not normally warrant expedited review. The D. C. Circuit’s intervention ruling takes on whatever salience it has only because of its presence in a larger underlying dispute about the Title 42 orders. And on that score, it is unclear what we might accomplish. Even if at the end of it all we find that the States are permitted to intervene, and even if the States manage on remand to demonstrate that the Title 42 orders were lawfully adopted, the emergency on which those orders were premised has long since lapsed. In April 2022, the federal government terminated the Title 42 orders after determining that emergency immigration restrictions were no longer necessary or appropriate to address COVID–19. 87 Fed. Reg. 19944. The States may question whether the government followed the right administrative steps before issuing this decision (an issue on which I express no view). But they do not seriously dispute that the public-health justification undergirding the Title 42 orders has lapsed. And it is hardly obvious why we should rush in to review a ruling on a motion to intervene in a case concerning emergency decrees that have outlived their shelf life. The only plausible reason for stepping in at this stage that I can discern has to do with the States’ second request. The States contend that they face an immigration crisis at the border and policymakers have failed to agree on adequate measures to address it. The only means left to mitigate the crisis, the States suggest, is an order from this Court directing the federal government to continue its COVID-era Title 42 policies as long as possible—at the very least during the pendency of our review. Today, the Court supplies just such an order. For my part, I do not discount the States’ concerns. Even the federal government acknowledges “that the end of the Title 42 orders will likely have disruptive consequences.” Brief in Opposition for Federal Respondents 6. But the current border crisis is not a COVID crisis. And courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency. We are a court of law, not policymakers of last resort.
What I DO NOT understand is WHY the court is NOT DEMANDING that current immigration laws ARE NOT BEING FOLLOWED!! We have immigration laws being broken every damn day, WHY are these AG’s not demanding current laws be followed, instead they are going around the LAWS with some medical statutes!!
How racist./sarc
This is simply a way to avoid the dam completely breaking on the border...and all the flood waters coming in.
Now how many of those waiting will continue doing so? They’re cold and hungry and the media is alreayd saying it’s a “Humanitarian problem” of course.
Gorsuch is RIGHT in this ruling, WE ALL either want freedom from Covid regulations OR WE DON’T, we can’t have it both ways!! Our immigration LAWS on the books are being broken WHY are these AG’s NOT going to the court with the braking of the laws we have, instead of some medical statute?.
Those on the border don’t care what our laws say. In tim they’re going to barge thru it all anyway.
Covid law is BS. I guess Gorsuch is right. But we have to use it. It's the only card in our hand we have right now. No other Trump card.
Tomorrow. Two years. Ten years. I guess it doesn't really matter that much.
Roberts is why we have OBAMACARE!
Actually McCain is WHY we STILL HAVE Ocare!!!!
My modest proposal for ending all illegal immigration in the US.
1. Announce that no benefits of any kind will go to illegals or their offspring.
2. Announce that all illegals must leave in the next 6 months or they will be forcibly removed, all their property seized, and any change of EVER coming back denied.
3. Once deporting starts, all assets will be sold to pay for the increased expense of the operation.
4. All open areas to be fenced with double fence with minefields and machine gun towers. Those killed in no-mans land will be left to rot as warning to others.
5. Illegals insisting their children were born here will have their children removed from them and sent back to their country, or they can chooose to take them back with them.
6. There will be np provision for sympathy, or emotion. This is killing us and must be denied to survive.
7. Anyone caught again after this will be put on hard labor building the wall for a year. Third time is death. No exceptions.
8. America first for Americans. Any judge/politician who rules otherwise to be removed from office and jailed for 5 years. If they can’t understand the Constitution, then they can read about it in jail.
9. Don’t like it, then don’t come here. Any illegal protesting in America to be immediately arrested, deported the next day and all assets seized to pay for the effort.
10. Think I am being to hard, cry to the families of those killed by these parasites. Those who can’t be sent back to their home countries to be jailed forever or until another country will take them. (Provisions to be studied for sending them to uninhabited islands far from our shores.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.