Posted on 01/07/2023 6:08:04 PM PST by nickcarraway
A bomb cyclone hit California this week, knocking out power, downing trees, and dumping massive amounts of water.
Some California residents are watching this precious H20 wash away and wondering, why can't we save the water for times when we desperately need it?
The state grapples with drought, but it's not as simple as putting out a big bucket, says hydrogeologist and professor at UC Santa Cruz, Andrew Fisher.
Professor Fisher spoke with NPR about the challenges facing the state, but also the opportunities that are already being worked on.
This interview has been lighted edited for length and clarity.
Interview highlights
On how much water can be stored for later and where
Some of it can be captured for later, but the short answer is it falls so quickly that we lack the ability to take that water and set it aside quickly enough in a place where we can store it for later. The primary forms of storage for water in California are the snowpack, that typically accumulates annually, and then reservoirs behind dams, and then groundwater aquifers.
Sponsor Message
California's 'Pineapple Express' relents, with some areas starting cleanup efforts
And the challenge is that when we get a lot of rainfall like this, it's not forming snowpack in lower areas. And reservoirs tend to fill up rather quickly. Then we have aquifers, and they have space, but it's hard to get water where it needs to be so it can infiltrate into the ground. And even then, it's hard to get it in fast enough.
On the different challenges with capturing rainwater
Because the water falls at a very fast rate and it creates a hazard, we do tend to treat stormwater as a nuisance and try to get it off the landscape as quickly as possible.
So, when we have the option to hold that water back a little bit and let it percolate into the ground, this is a tremendous opportunity. However, sometimes that water is not suitable for drinking. That's an additional bottleneck because you can't treat the water as quickly as it's falling or as quickly as it's running off. And, of course, the level of treatment you need might vary from place to place, and it does create quite a logistical challenge in order to deal with that water.
On where the stormwater flows when it's not being captured
It's going to a variety of places. A lot of it will end up rolling out to the ocean. Some of it is being diverted and we're collecting some of this stormwater and directing it towards infiltration basins where it can percolate into the ground.
There are other folks around the state and around the western United States who run similar projects. So people are trying to collect as much of this stormwater as we can when we have this opportunity. It turns out, a lot of water is falling, a lot of water is running off, so a large part of that does end up flowing out to the ocean.
On the current storm with more rain coming
I've got a student group that's out right now, sampling from some of our systems. And we dashed out here between the storms, because it's an opportunity when it's safe to go collect water samples and see how water quality looks. I'll just note that we have to get more water in the ground. We simply have no choice.
The rain needs to fall on the Sierras and then runoff to the coast. It appears the coast is getting the brunt of it.
Actually, they get snow.
Gibberish. Captain Obvious’ take on what happens when it rains. It’s rare you see an article so devoid of useful information
It is hitting the mountains also. The problem is they are sending the water to the ocean for species preservation. The choice is between water for farms and houses or sending it to the ocean so the critters in the rivers get all the water they want.
Here in Florida retention ponds for storm water are now required on new development.
In early September my backyard becomes Lake Griffin.
Because stupid people run California.
They can’t think outside of their green ideology.
So “that’s the rub.”
They could step pond dam rivers in sort of Chinese rice terrace style.
The fish already in a river would be happy and the salmon could jump their way home.
“… a large part of that does end up flowing out to the ocean.”
I bet the salmon are happy, anyways.
Absolutely correct! Dam is a dirty word in the Western USA.
Do you live near the actual Lake Griffon? The reason I ask is that there are some sketchy houses built along it that appear to be swamps and they probably sold it to people as "Lake View". Lol.
Californians b^tch about GW because there is a drought, then they b^tch about GW because it rains a lot.
California ski resorts are getting pounded w snow.
People (even Californians) before MudlickerFlipperDaubers...
Because California o
Got rid of many of its reservoirs
Just NPR (deep state) excuse for the fact that California, in spite of successive droughts, has failed to expand its resovoirs enough, and even, intentionally diverts to the ocean a ton of water that comes down the rivers and streams in the central valley.
Uh, nowhere to store it? The last major dam and reservoir were completed 50 years ago when the state population was half of what it is today.
But I’ll go with your answer.
“It’s rare you see an article so devoid of useful information”
Not when it’s an NPR article written by Mary, Erika and Lee.
“I bet the salmon are happy, anyways.”
I talked to a guy launching his boat today to go salmon fishing. Except he’s going after Kokanee, a land-locked salmon that never goes to the ocean nor fights its way back upstream to spawn. Our land-locked Kokanee are always happy.
Except when they spawn and die by the thousands.
A number of years ago kalifornia voters approved a big bond measure to build more dams. Needless to say the money got spent on everything but new reservoirs
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.