Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

maybe it's a proposition who's time has come?
1 posted on 01/09/2023 2:35:45 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blueplum
Already tired and failed. First with the General Allotment Act of 1887, then the Indian "New Deal" Reorganization Act of 1934, then the Termination Act of 1946, and then the Indian "Self-Determination" Act of 1970, and then the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, plus a whole slew of lesser legislation in between.

"Self Determination Without Termination" President Richard M. Nixon's Approach To Native American Policy Reform

There are just too many treaties and laws in place and judicial precedent to ever end the reservations, so the congresswoman is about to kick over a hornet's nest for herself.

2 posted on 01/09/2023 3:37:03 AM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Today, more than 70% of Native Americans live off reservation.

And

they’re now spending time responding to the proposed resolution rather than focusing on their own legislative priorities

IE, give us more money.

I am not well studied on Indian affairs. But the language of the resolution is true and highlighted by the tribes themselves when they want more funds for this and that.
Changing the system would upset a huge money making apple cart, I am guessing from the response.


3 posted on 01/09/2023 3:37:09 AM PST by Adder (ALL Democrats are the enemy. NO QUARTER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

“led to substance abuse, domestic violence, welfare dependence, poverty and substandard education.”

A lot of this is due to bad personal choices.


5 posted on 01/09/2023 4:17:50 AM PST by rfreedom4u ("You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

End special federal services for tribes & their members.

If Central American Indians can be highly productive in the USA, so can US Indians.


7 posted on 01/09/2023 4:55:57 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Tribal land belongs to the tribe and it is their decision to make, not Uncle Sam’s.


8 posted on 01/09/2023 4:58:38 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

The idea of a “sovereign nation” within a sovereign nation is ridiculous. Either they’re Americans, or they’re not. Choose one.

They get special privileges, special taxation, special benefits, and don’t have to obey US laws if they’re on the land of the “sovereign nation.”

They’re a specially-privileged, government-certified victim group with special benefits. Time for this nonsense to stop. They were once proud self-sufficient people. The current system ruined them.


9 posted on 01/09/2023 5:07:26 AM PST by I want the USA back (News media not worth camel spit. My pronouns: Haha, heehee, hoho. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Where’s my casino ?


10 posted on 01/09/2023 5:28:09 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.q at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

There’s no problem with the reservation system other than the welfare part. Buy out the welfare part, then allow each tribe to prosper or go bankrupt as they choose.

Montana is a good example. The Flathead reservation is well-managed and any tribal member can be proud, ditto visitors. But, the Blackfeet reservation is desolate, poor, riddled with substance abuse. The members of the Blackfeet who stay on the reservation do so for the welfare benefits worked into their treaty. Yes, differences between these two tribes include that the Flathead were a civilized tribe at the time of their encounter with the whites, while the Blackfeet were a nomadic people. But, these differences don’t have to continue forever.

Let the tribes decide their rules for membership. If they want to tie membership with living on the reservation and, so, condemn their young people to severely reduced economic opportunities, that’s on them. But, if they want to convert their reservations into homelands, so their history and culture will be sustained into the future there, while members can come and go as opportunities open to them. Well, I suspect they’ll do just fine.


11 posted on 01/09/2023 5:32:04 AM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Somebody explain treaties to the Montana law maker.


16 posted on 01/09/2023 6:29:21 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

Maybe they should admit they are American citizens and join the club


17 posted on 01/09/2023 6:48:29 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueplum

You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink.

Government destroyed the most uplifting course correction in human history — the teaching and preaching of the Gospel in the public square.

Now government wants to invent a synthetic behavioral system devoid of any underlying morality, other than “we’re the government, and we want your vote in exchange for ineffectual programs.”


19 posted on 01/09/2023 11:53:54 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("There is no good government at all & none possible."--Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson