Posted on 01/14/2023 11:51:30 AM PST by Perseverando
118th CONGRESS
1st Session
To prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime and to amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of hate crimes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 9, 2023
Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime and to amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of hate crimes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Leading Against White Supremacy Act of 2023”.
SEC. 2. WHITE SUPREMACY INSPIRED HATE CRIME.
(a) In General.—A person engages in a white supremacy inspired hate crime when white supremacy ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance of activity that, if effectuated, would have constituted a crime.
(b) Conspiracy.—A conspiracy to engage in white supremacy inspired hate crime shall be determined to exist—
(1) between two or more persons engaged in the planning, development, preparation, or perpetration of a white supremacy inspired hate crime; or
(2) between two or more persons—
(Excerpt) Read more at congress.gov ...
I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure that should this bill become law, I could be prosecuted for "conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime" for just posting or discussing the information about this bill on FR or some other news/information website.
I absolutely hate "hate crimes."
Evidently black supremacy is acceptable.
What a racist bill. Dark skinned people are the worst racists.
So, how many republicrats will “aye”it?
Hate to say it but this bill will probably pass.
All Dims will be on board. And I don’t think there will be many Republicans brave enough to stand up and vote no.
A “no” vote would bring media and internet criticism and that frightens most Republicans.
It’s both funny, and shameful, that her name is “Jackson-Lee”.
Isn’t Jackson-Lee Day coming very soon?
We used to have it here in Baltimore until they tore down the statue.
LOL. Whatever.
She is an idiot.
When are they going to codify all the “conspiracies” to gang up on whites? Or when blacks gang up on various groups they really hate, like Jews and yellows?
“Hate(sic) Crime” is code for “Thought Crime”.
She knows it cant pass.
The idea is to get Republicans to vote against it. Then the Ratz can point fingers and say “they voted in favor of White supremacy!”
Go slap another security guard SJL.
That woman is dumber than Hank Johnson I swear.
I call them “thought crimes” laws because such legislation is as Orwellian as it sounds. I’ll hate if I want to hate. No one can censor my feelings or my thoughts!
Apparently! Melanometric Privilege!
She had all the time in the world these past four years when Pelosi was Speaker to bring up this bill.
Why now?
To trap and tar the Republican majority as racists and allow the media to push this narrative.
Her and Jeffries know damn well this is worded to ensure no Republican—or sane person who wants people to get along rather than each throats—would vote for such a clearly unconstitutional law.
It’s a Congressional Gotcha.
And purely a political ploy.
“Hate” crimes are just thought crimes. It really doesn’t matter if someone hates someone else for whatever reason, it only matters if they commit a criminal action against that person. Whether or not they love, hate or are indifferent to their victim doesn’t matter. What happens to the victim is what matters, but it can’t just be because his or her feelings were hurt.
She “annoys me”.
The far left progressives are actually lily white. Nearly seven-in-ten Progressive Left (68%) are White adults, making this group less racially and ethnically diverse than the other Democratic-oriented groups.
Yet, these Dems hold not only extremist views on race, but views more extreme than those held by more racially-diverse Dem groups.
They live in enclaves in cities, prefer going to museums over going to the range, and think religion is sophistry. Their policies and language all reek of a Superiority Complex.
I get Affinity bias. We all have it. I'd probably be rejected by an Anarcho-Syndicalist Commune and the feeling would be mutual.
But Erika Donalds' experience is worth remembering when dunderheads like Rep Lee say WE are all haters. And while I haven't walked in her shoes, I can tell you, when behind closed doors, and if "progressives" think you're "one of them," their mask slips and (using affluent code language) you see how they REALLY feel about the races.
Scratch a progressive, find a Klansman in a suit and tie or lab coat.
GFY beeyotch.
CC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.