Posted on 01/17/2023 1:40:50 PM PST by lightman
President Joe Biden’s administration in a court hearing on Jan. 17 urged judges on a federal appeals court to overturn a ruling from a lower court that struck down the administration’s airplane mask mandate.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had “good cause” to impose the mandate and bypass the notice- and comment period required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Brian Springer, an attorney for the government, told judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
At the time the mandate was imposed, in early 2021, “there were variants that had just been detected that showed signs of increased transmissibility, and people were starting to travel again,” Springer said. “In those circumstances, the CDC had good cause to issue this order, particularly when the CDC detailed the reasons why in this particular environment, namely in the transportation sector and in transportation settings, COVID had a specific tendency to spread among people who are traveling together because they’re standing together in lines and sitting together on conveyances.”
One of the judges expressed skepticism with the line of thinking, accusing the CDC of issuing “boilerplate” language to impose the mandate without a notice and comment period. Under a ruling in a separate case, boilerplate statements that COVID-19 exists and that there’s a public emergency aren’t sufficient to satisfy the “good cause” exception to the APA. Springer disagreed, saying the CDC’s statement provided rationale that met the standard.
U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, a Trump appointee, said in her 2022 ruling that the CDC violated the APA by only issuing a single conclusory sentence to support ducking the notice requirements.
She noted that at the time the order was issued, around a year had passed since the beginning of the pandemic, and COVID-19 cases in America were on the decline.
Brent Hardaway, arguing for Health Freedom Defense Fund, which brought the case, said that the mandate was “very strange” given that airplanes and many airports already had mandates in place, in addition to the decline in cases. Does the CDC Have Authority to Mandate Masks?
Other portions of the hearing went over arguments as to whether the CDC has the authority to mandate masks.
U.S. code gives the federal government the power to enforce regulations judged as “necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the States or possessions, or from one State or possession into any other State or possession.”
The government, to enforce such measures, “may provide for such inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, destruction of animals or articles found to be so infected or contaminated as to be sources of dangerous infection to human beings, and other measures, as in his judgment may be necessary,” the statute says.
In striking down the CDC’s moratorium on evictions, the Supreme Court found that the agency overstepped the authority outlined in the law. But the court also said the law empowered the CDC to impose measures that “directly relate to preventing the interstate spread of disease by identifying, isolating, and destroying the disease itself.”
The decision “recognized that conventional measures to identify, isolate and destroy communicable diseases fall within the statute,” Springer said. “The CDC’s mask order was a very modest way to, and a traditional way to, prevent this interstate spread of disease that falls directly within the heartland of what the Supreme Court told us that this statute covers.”
Springer asked the court to narrow the district court’s decision from applying to all travelers to just the five individuals that brought the case. If the court agrees, it would enable the mask mandate to take effect again for virtually all Americans inside airports, airplanes, and some other transportation settings.
Mizelle has ruled that mask mandates don’t fall under sanitation and that the “other measures” were limited, based on a reading of the history of the law and court rulings.
“The mask mandate is best understood not as sanitation, but as an exercise of the CDC’s power to conditionally release individuals to travel despite concerns that they may spread a communicable disease (and to detain or partially quarantine those who refuse). But the power to conditionally release and detain is ordinarily limited to individuals entering the United States from a foreign country,” Mizelle wrote, noting that a part of the law only allows for the detention of a person traveling between the states if that person is “reasonably believed to be infected” and is actually found “upon examination” to be infected.
That means the CDC exceeded its authority in issuing the mandate, the judge said.
Hardaway, in court on Tuesday, said that the law does not give the CDC the ability to impose mask mandates, though one of the judges questioned whether that was true.
“It just seems strange to me that an agency like the Center for Disease Control doesn’t have the authority to require travelers to wear a mask when they travel as a way to prevent the spread of communicable disease in the context of a global pandemic,” the judge said. “If they don’t have that authority, what authority do they have?”
Hardaway said the eviction ruling showed why it was not odd and urged the judges to look at the law, which has been used by the government to impose various measures.
“Their reading of sanitation is basically any measure that may promote sanitation,” he said. “It’s basically going to have the same kind of sweeping implications of the rule that the Supreme Court rejected.”
Their fetish about those nasty face diapers is downright sick.
I watched a maskerbating woman wearing one in the passenger seat of her husband’s car, then out of doors into a restaurant where it was promptly removed at the table...even before anything was served.
What was the point?
Not to worry...it will only be for two weeks. They have to flatten the curve.
I’ve seen people put them on at the door to the restaurant, go to their table, be seated and take it off. Total mask wearing time 8 seconds. Just unbelievable.
Trying to change the national focus, jackass?
Joseph Stolen is an idiot
Why, virtue signaling, of course. 😄
Some masked woman in a hallway asked me for directions to a specific office several months ago. I provided the directions and she kept talking. She was friendly enough, so I chatted with her as I made my way to the exit of the building we were in.
As I neared the door to leave the building, she just couldn’t stand it and started telling me why she was wearing the mask.
I hadn’t asked, hadn’t mentioned the mask and hadn’t really even looked at the mask.
But there she went, telling me something about how she was around someone with a cold or something and didn’t want to spread it, blah, blah, blah…
It confirmed my belief that they wear those things for attention. I made a hasty retreat to my car before I caved in to the temptation to say, “I *really* don’t care, Karen.”
Remember, that piece of cloth will stop viruses. And garlic will keep away the vampires too!
Science!
They should at the very least have show strong evidence that wearing the masks reduces the spread. They can’t, of course.
But more concerning is what comes after this? Every flu season is mask flying season? Every passenger year-round has to pass a sniffle test? Drop trow and cough?
This was common during the hysterical phase of Pandemic. The rules were you had to wear one, except while eating or drinking. So many people did exactly that including me. Put the mask on outside the front door, wear it to the table, take it off as soon as a glass of water is served. As for myself, I was just respecting the restaurant owners and the staff's jobs. I wouldn't want them to get fired or fined so I played the charade. No sense in me making a protest statement out of someone else's livelihood.
After about a year of the crap, I got real cantankerous and quit wearing them. Most people that asked me to put it on weren’t very nice. There was one exception — the owner of our local fruit stand. He took me outside for a private discussion, was so polite and nice about it, and explained his legal jeopardy with the county health kooks. I always wore it at his store after that kindness.
The economy us not yet 100% destroyed.
That was a good one
Just continuing proof, as if it were needed, that CoupFlu policy has NEVER been about protecting public health.
LOL - that was a good one. I like the little sheep-bleats added to the music.
This is another good one.
I Wear My Face Mask in My Car
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cp_NB0GDECI
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.