Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW

I’m trying to figure out “snatched”. If the land is already owned by the US government, then how is allocating its use for solar energy “snatching” it. Usually I would use that for privately owned land taken by the government.


9 posted on 01/21/2023 10:25:13 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Soon the January 6 protesters will be held (without trial or bail) longer than Jefferson Davis was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

“If the land is already owned by the US government, then how is allocating its use for solar energy “snatching” it. Usually I would use that for privately owned land taken by the government.”

______

Could it be because people think of “public lands” as belonging to the people and for their enjoyment rather than for the government to give to a private contractor to build a solar power farm that will only benefit a few?


12 posted on 01/21/2023 10:33:43 AM PST by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio

There will no longer be ‘public use’ of that land.


28 posted on 01/21/2023 11:27:42 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio

Better question...why is FedGov the largest land owner in the nation?


37 posted on 01/21/2023 12:19:34 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson