Posted on 01/28/2023 2:40:14 PM PST by Its All Over Except ...
The Pope met with the Tribunal of the Roman Rota for the beginning of the judicial year.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
Again, who authorized him to contradict Jesus and St. Paul per Mark 10:6-9, 1 Cor. 7:10-11, and elsewhere along with Sacred Tradition?
Mark 10:6-9, Douay-Rheims:
[6] But from the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. [7] For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife. [8] And they two shall be in one flesh. Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh. [9] What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
1 Cor. 7:10-11, Douay-Rheims:
[10) But to them that are married, not I but the Lord commandeth, that the wife depart not from her husband. [11] And if she depart, that she remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband. And let not the husband put away his wife.
Nah, ignore all that as Bergoglio says it’s all good; he’s blessed everything now I guess. /sarc.
This heretic punk is dying to sanction gay marriage. He’s almost there now.
A guy I went to high school with has been married five times...twice to women. What say you. Frankie?
I wonder if he’ll end up being removed by church hierarchy?
It’s happened before, I believe twice, once being about a 1,000 years ago.
Maybe the pope should marry his goat
Positively biblical.
Not many other times had so much anti-Christian rhetoric from a Pope.
Homos gonna homo…
Just gearing up for the tribulation.
Married in a religion that don't use the word sacrament? (example Judaism)
A civil ceremony?
Or is he specifically talking about Sodomite pseudo-marriage?
The PRINCE of LIES!
“We’ll just make this up as we go along”
Things may get bumpy. I got out of the way long ago, but the Dark Side is moving much faster these days.
Well, he has reiterated the correct teaching that marriage is a lifelong union between a man and a woman. I will give him credit.
I think he’s closing the door on ‘gay’ unions as he faces the prospect of his own coming judgment. If that’s the case, then good!
I think this pertains to him greasing the skids for the conclusion in 2024 for ths Sinod on Sinodality so as to allow communion for as many more as possible, most likely adulterous remarriages and those from civil marriages.
In the end, Bergoglio once again pecks away at traditionalism and Sacred Scripture when he has all the time in the world to counter Fr James Martin pushing his worldly agenda or the German bishops openly supporting gay marriage, women priests, etc, but no.
He’s an idiot who cares more about his communist overlords than he does about the Lord.
“A civil ceremony?
Or is he specifically talking about Sodomite pseudo-marriage?”
Bergoglio’s apologists would likely say that he’s just talking about (hetero) civil ceremonies, but I’m not so sure. Unless he’s trashing conservatives/traditionalists with whom he takes a forthright, crystal-clear, make-no-mistakes-about-it approach, Bergoglio often speaks in hints and codes. The LGBT crowd will take this “EVERY marriage is a gift from God” as shout out to them and run with it... which is probably what he intended.
He ain’t the Pope.
ANTI pope. Not the pope. Never has been, never will be. Pure evil.
Unless they were a traditional latin marriage.
This sounds like a strong hint that he wants to sanction homosexual marriage.
Also included would be polygamy, if he’s saying all marriages should be honored.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.