Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chewbarkah

While true, he also didn’t charge anyone with the FBI itself. His cases against those he did bring charges against had the flaw that he was trying to prove that the lies mattered to the FBI when it was clear the FBI was going to do whatever it wanted and just used the lies as fig leafs for their misbehavior.


38 posted on 02/20/2023 12:46:16 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

Absolutely. Torturing reality to prevent admitting the DoJ/FBI was a willing participant likely made any sentient jurors view the whole proceeding as dishonest, and gave them an excuse to acquit. The optimist in me interprets Durham as attempting a stepping stone strategy eventually to reach the government insiders and expose the whole operation. The realist sees him as a peripheral insider intent on running out the clock and “preserving the institution” in all its corrupt glory. He likes oozing out some dirt, but doesn’t want to crash the house of cards.


39 posted on 02/20/2023 7:04:21 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson