And an appellate judge, to top it off.
Good luck on that, unless money supporters of the school speak up. School and administrators better hope they doesn’t face that judge or his friends in court.
And an appellate judge, to top it off.
We will descend into anarchy in the next decade or two. The left has gone completely off the reservation
There should be no DEI positions at any college or university in the United States.
I’m glad to see at least that he’s fighting back. This is insane.
Nazis.
The diversity dean showed up to suggest the school nix its free speech policy because the federal judge’s remarks caused “harm” and free speech isn’t worth “dividing” the students.
These demented “top schools” are providing the radicalized leadership of the CIA and FBI.
Never give these perverts any respect. They are insatiable and will always want more. They will destroy America in the process. Don’t give them a damn thing. Don’t give them jobs. Don’t give them money. Abuse the crap out of them. Ridicule them. Make them outcasts from OUR society. Make them shut up and go away.
Stanford Law students and graduates hoping to clerk in Duncan’s court don’t need to waste time applying.
“who stepped in during the event to chastise him and deliver what the judge described as a “bizarre therapy session from hell.”
She’d have killed him if she thought she could get away with it.
L
The best way to stop this is to forbid law students who act like this from EVER being admitted to any Bar in any U.S. jurisdiction. If they want to be terrorists, NEVER give ANY of them a law license! They can take to the streets but they must be forbidden to act like thugs in any official capacity.
Thank you for posting this.
The judge should try to have those who disrupted his presentation identified, publicized and informed that if they ever appeared before him on a case, that he would crush them and bar them from his court, and even recommend that their bar license be suspended for Six months.
That would be fun to watch.
Some folks just need killin’.
These people are dangerous to our Constitutional republic. We may as well put Bolsheviks in charge of our legal system.
10 years ago with the safe spacers it was funny, until I thought through the potential long-term implications.
this is scary.
a country producing this in their law schools is going to be producing highly political death camps in 10 more.
Stanford needs to be added to the list of law schools in which federal judges refuse to accept students as law clerks. Law Schools are proud (very proud) each year to announce how many of their former students have been accepted as federal court clerks.
It’s a big competition, and if you go onto a law school’s website, they will have the number of alums who have clerkship positions prominently displayed along with their other stat numbers. Several judges have said they will no longer accept Yale law graduates as clerks. After this display, I suspect Stanford will be added to the list, at least by a large number of federal judges.
The administrator should be fired. She showed an extreme lack of professionalism and respect to the judge who had taken his time from his busy schedule to come and speak to the students. It could have been a great learning experience for them. They deprived the students who wanted to listen and learn from having that opportunity. Instead, the activist students learned that if they stomped their feet more and shout louder, they would be appeased.
“Other questions were less academic. “I fuck men, I can find the prostate,” one student asked, according to Rosenberger. “Why can’t you find the clit?””
It’s almost impossible to believe a law student spoke in such a manner to a Federal Judge. Does he/she/it not realize he name will be found and circulated far and wide among judges who will not want someone such as it anywhere near their chambers? Even most leftist judges will not want such a lose cannon in their court. For someone such as that cannot be trusted. Actually, a Bar Association of just a few years ago would find that someone such as that would not have the professionalism necessary to be admitted.
These were “law students” - who not that long ago would have been expelled for this kind of behavior and never been admitted to the bar due to lack of ethics.