There are more laws in California that protect the wrong than there are to protect the innocent.
That should work out well.
Of course they are.
Punish the innocent, reward the guilty.
Trying to have students sober is racist. /s
"High feelings!" You can't make this crap up!
My solution: Send them to the school principal's private home, and let them sober up there!
Regards,
“”high feelings of school connectedness can decrease drug use””
Ain’t difficult to tell who is high and on drugs in CA!!!!!
Leave the kids high or drunk in class. They will only endanger the other kids. Who the hell is coming up with these stupid laws? What morons.
I’m a veteran urban school high school teacher. When rules against bad behavior are relaxed, you’ll get even more of that bad behavior. It’s just that simple.
And I’ll tell you who will be hurt most by this. It will be the decent kids who come to school sober and willing to learn. Their classes will be disrupted now even more than before.
As a side note, even in my worst classes perhaps 80% of the kids were decent. They might have had attendance problems. But when they were there they behaved, and they tried. But oh, that remaining 20%. They were chronically disruptive, and the administration cared little to correct that. I suffered, but the education of the good kids suffered more.
Three words: remove the distraction
Once upon a time, kali led the nation in education and educational innovation. Amazing how fast they’ve risen to last place.
IS THERE ONE SINGLE WORKING BRAIN CELL IN THE ENTIRE CALIF LEGISLATURE????
NEVER REWARD BAD BEHAVIOR
Went and read the actual Bill...
It’s even worse than just the drugs...
What... the... hell.
Sending good kids into the Lion’s Den every single day.
But if they get caught carrying a Bible....
“high feelings of school connectedness can decrease drug use”
No IQ is to low to be in the California Legislature and logic is a form of racism.
Leftism: irresponsible life without consequences.
Let's make school a "Real-world total learning environment", shall we?
I would say the ban on expulsions should be only enforced on the 1st and or 2nd incidence, but after “3 strikes” the student should be out. The ban should only be enforced as far as it works, but its failure to change a student’s behavior should end enforcement of the ban. Once, O.K., twice maybe but three times should end it.
They should just pass a “No Consequences” law where no matter what you do there are no consequences. This steady drip, drip, drip of de-evolution is tiring.
DWI folks are expected to file an ‘amicus curiae’ document.