Where was this judge when Jack Ryan was going to run against Obama for Senate and the Chicago Tribune got his divorce records unsealed?
“Where was this judge when Jack Ryan was going to run against Obama for Senate and the Chicago Tribune got his divorce records unsealed?”
I believe that’s the point I realized that for the left “anything goes if it works in our favor” was their motto. They demand that THEIR actions be hidden under the rights of privacy, historical standards, and the law. But when it comes to conservatives, all information should be revealed and legal action taken, even if they were just defending a democrat on the same issue just a few days or weeks before.
The judges who agree with these two standards of justice, and even write such into their opinions is going to be one of the main causes of the down-fall of our nation.
In the past, you could read a judge’s opinion on a case, and see how it was based upon Constitutional law. You may not agree with it, but you understood the reasoning. Beginning with Roe v Wade, that changed (it is great that decision based on faulty reasoning was finally overturned). Now, they can twist the words of the Constitution in order to apply laws one way against conservatives and just the opposite when it comes to progressives.