Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now even CHINESE scientists claim Covid did not jump to humans inside infamous Wuhan market in blow to natural animal origin theory
UK Daily Mail ^ | April 6 2023 | EMILY CRAIG

Posted on 04/06/2023 1:15:41 AM PDT by knighthawk

Covid's natural origin theory was today seemingly dealt a huge blow — by China's very own scientists.

In a fresh twist to the never-ending saga, Beijing-affiliated researchers ruled there was no proof to definitively say the virus jumped from animals to humans at a now-infamous market in Wuhan.

Swathes of patients struck down at the start of the pandemic visited or had links to its stalls, which sold bats, raccoon dogs, pangolins and other exotic species either proven to harbour similar coronaviruses or thought to.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: covid; covidtruth; wuhan; wuhanlableak; wujanlableak

1 posted on 04/06/2023 1:15:41 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I would suggest this....if you said this was a animal-to-human transmission from a real wet-market, then just about all of China would have shut down virtually every single wet-market within weeks. It would have been the total end of the traditional market (going back over 2,000 years).

Yet, you didn’t see the public react in that way. Traditional Chinese simply didn’t believe the BS-story and continued on with the wet-market tradition.

Logically, this suggestive story (even carried on by US scientists/doctors)....has zero proof.


2 posted on 04/06/2023 2:07:38 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

1. All we need to know about COVID-19 is that it could have been released by humans deliberately as a germ warfare.

2. We also know, certain persons have benefited from COVID-19: the 2020 presidential election results were heavily influenced by mail-in ballots. No COVID-19; no millions of mail-in ballots.

3. We also know, COVID-19 became a pandemic just about the time we discovered the Bidens had an apparent conflict of interest in Ukraine. Unrelated coincidence? Maybe but not necessarily so - especially when we consider the above two points.


3 posted on 04/06/2023 4:45:20 AM PDT by Prolixus (In all seriousness:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Welcome to 2020


4 posted on 04/06/2023 6:35:04 AM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Early on, it was known that the first people to have COVID-19
had no connection to he Wuhan Wet Market.

It became known that this ‘product’ had been developed at the
Wuhan Biolab (at least it was highly suspected, and I believe
confirmed at times).

Fauci was found to have sent funding to develop change of
function upgrades to viruses. He still denies to this day
that was what was happening. It seems he was lying.

This calls to question how he downgraded the possibility
that the virus came from the above lab. I’m not sure if
he put pressure on any person or entity, to keep the Wet
Market theory active.

So now he’s headed off to work his magic elsewhere.

Must be nice to be untouchable.


5 posted on 04/07/2023 12:18:52 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for? which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson