Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Challenge to Biden ‘Cost of Carbon’ policy dismissed
The Associated Press ^ | April 6, 2023 | By KEVIN McGILL and MATTHEW BROWN

Posted on 04/06/2023 6:21:52 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A lawsuit that Louisiana and other Republican-leaning states filed challenging figures the Biden administration uses to calculate damages from greenhouse gasses was dismissed Wednesday by a federal appeals court.

The unanimous decision by three judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans was the latest defeat for states challenging the Biden “cost of carbon” policy. It leaves the administration to continue using a damage cost estimate of about $51 per ton of carbon dioxide emissions as it develops environmental regulations. That estimate is under review by the administration and could increase.

The Biden cost estimate had been used during former President Barack Obama’s administration. President Joe Biden restored it on his first day in office after the administration of former President Donald Trump had reduced the figure to about $7 or less per ton.

On Thursday the appeals court dismissed the case, saying the challenging states had no standing to sue because they had not shown that the regulations caused the economic harms their lawsuit cited.

The $51 per ton estimate was established in 2016 and used to justify major rules such as the Clean Power Plan — former President Barack Obama’s signature effort to address climate change by tightening emissions standards from coal-fired power plants — and separate rules imposing tougher vehicle emission standards. However, the Clean Power Plan never took effect after being blocked by federal courts.

Now, the administration is reviewing the $51 per ton estimate. The Environmental Protection Agency in September proposed a cost roughly four times higher than the Obama figure.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 72to21; americanpravda; associatedpravda; carbon; clownbammyjudge; corywilson; epa; globalwarming; grabbypoppyjudge; grabbypoppystooge; hoax; jacqueswiener; jamescain; jamesdcain; jamesdcainjr; kevinmcgill; lawsuit; matthewbrown; obamajudge; obamastooge; propaganda; socialism; stephenhigginson; trumpjudge; wdlouisiana

1 posted on 04/06/2023 6:21:52 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“It leaves the administration to continue using a damage cost estimate of about $51 per ton of carbon dioxide emissions “

So does that mean they will charge John Kerry $51 per ton of CO2 his private jet spews out every time he goes somewhere?


2 posted on 04/06/2023 6:26:33 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

the EPA should be abolished


3 posted on 04/06/2023 6:27:21 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I wish governors would band together and take Biden to court for his disastrous, dangerous lack of border policy that is resulting in children being forced into prostitution

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4143660/posts

He is supposed to work to keep people safe, and he is clearly failing to do so, and people and kids are suffering terribly for it and Noone on the left gives a crap


4 posted on 04/06/2023 6:29:08 AM PDT by Bob434 (question )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

No, they will charge us.


5 posted on 04/06/2023 6:35:00 AM PDT by kallisti (Stay aware, no matter what happens or apparently happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

The Plaintiff States had no standing and therefore the case was dismissed. The States were unable to articulate a specific tenable harm by Executive Order.


6 posted on 04/06/2023 6:46:11 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Damn Feral “judgies” dismiss everything and anything submitted by REAL AMERICANS to their chickensh*t courts. If you’re not a far-left dung beetle, you’re dismissed.


7 posted on 04/06/2023 6:46:46 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (It's time to indict the Dung Beetle Party's token affirmative action chubby cheeked shyster lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
the challenging states had no standing to sue because they had not shown that the regulations caused the economic harms their lawsuit cited.

I figured it had to be something like that.

Texas had "no standing" to sue over the 2020 election for a similar reason, but look at the country now - economic harm claims vindicated. And too late to sue as the steal is a fait accompli.

8 posted on 04/06/2023 6:57:36 AM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If a lawsuit does not show harm it has no standing. It should be dismissed.

Reformulate and resubmit. Surely there is a La company put down directly because of the regulation. There is your harm.
Judges are lawyers. Poor at maths. Speak to them as if they are your 6 year old kid.


9 posted on 04/06/2023 7:45:01 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
the appeals court dismissed the case, saying the challenging states had no standing to sue because they had not shown that the regulations caused the economic harms...

Bull.

10 posted on 04/06/2023 7:45:41 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Cold and Dark and Death are our friends!


11 posted on 04/06/2023 7:48:56 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Total rot.


12 posted on 04/06/2023 8:36:07 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson