If an ex President can be forced to adhere to a congressional subpoena seems a city DA also needs to comply, IMHO.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
2 posted on
04/19/2023 5:56:15 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
legitimate legislative purposesLibs never should of gone down that road, now payback is a BIT$H!
4 posted on
04/19/2023 6:02:22 PM PDT by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
A federal judge rejected an effort by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to block a Congressional subpoena of a former prosecutor for that office who had worked on an investigation into former President Donald Trump. The former prosecutor's name is Mark Pomerantz.
One very interesting item from his Wikipedia biography that caught my eye was this:
Pomerantz wrote a book about his involvement in the investigation of Trump, titled People vs. Donald Trump, which was released on February 7, 2023.
I would think the guy effectively surrendered any claim he may have had to quash a subpoena related to his work as a prosecutor when he published this book while a grand jury was considering criminal charges in the matter he was investigating.
5 posted on
04/19/2023 6:34:34 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("I've just pissed in my pants and nobody can do anything about it." -- Major Fambrough)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I love it. This was the same rationale they used to Get Trump’s tax returns.
6 posted on
04/19/2023 9:36:02 PM PDT by
31R1O
(The people who can control themselves ought to be able to defend themselves from the people who cann)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
